Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,690 of 84,120 nationally

Woodbrook Eviction Risk: Elevated , Fort Lewis

Tract 53053072000 · Pierce County, WA · pop 4,982 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 53053072000 covers Woodbrook in Fort Lewis in Washington. Home to 4,982 residents, it scores $1/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 73% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 65% of renter households, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,177 a month against an average household income of $47,540 a year, roughly 30% of income at the averages. About 75% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 49% Stable renters 27% Owners 24%
Tract context
Occupied units2,222
Renter share75.2%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate17.8%
Median income$47,540

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Woodbrook
Very High
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 13 tracts In Fort Lewis
High
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Very High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#137 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fort Lewis and the region

Centroid at 47.1229, -122.5402 · click any tract to drill in

Why Woodbrook scores 6.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fort Lewis
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
17.8% poverty · this tract
4.5
Supply constraint
$1,177 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Lewis
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Lewis
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Lewis
6.8

How Woodbrook compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Woodbrook risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.86.8This tracttract 072000Fort Lewis: 7.07.0Fort Lewisparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,539Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 10.14%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.7%Peak (2006)
  • 131Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530720002004: 140 filings (9.47/100 renter HHs)2005: 161 filings (11.45/100 renter HHs)2006: 178 filings (12.66/100 renter HHs)2007: 156 filings (11.09/100 renter HHs)2008: 144 filings (10.24/100 renter HHs)2009: 90 filings (6.40/100 renter HHs)2010: 124 filings (8.10/100 renter HHs)2012: 136 filings (10.49/100 renter HHs)2013: 152 filings (11.73/100 renter HHs)2014: 127 filings (9.80/100 renter HHs)2015: 131 filings (10.11/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 328Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 6.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.68×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 15 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2020-03-01: 7 filings (1.11× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.26× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2022-03-01: 9 filings (1.42× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 8 filings (0.96× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-08-01: 12 filings (1.56× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (1.80× baseline)2022-10-01: 8 filings (2.18× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2022-12-01: 9 filings (1.04× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (0.30× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.47× baseline)2023-04-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (0.84× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-07-01: 10 filings (1.58× baseline)2023-08-01: 19 filings (2.48× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (1.09× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2023-12-01: 13 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-01-01: 6 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-02-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2024-03-01: 10 filings (1.58× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 8 filings (0.96× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-07-01: 8 filings (1.26× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.26× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (1.09× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (1.09× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (0.69× baseline)2025-01-01: 5 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2025-03-01: 7 filings (1.11× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 10 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-06-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2025-10-01: 10 filings (2.72× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2025-12-01: 6 filings (0.69× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2026-03-01: 10 filings (1.58× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Woodbrook. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Woodbrook

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fort Lewis, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pierce County average of 5.5 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.68x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 96th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053072000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053072000?

Census tract 53053072000 in the Woodbrook neighborhood scores 6.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053072000?

Median gross rent is $1,177/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053072000?

17.8% of residents in tract 53053072000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,982.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053072000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 87th, minority 72th, housing 91th.
Q5

Is tract 53053072000 considered part of Woodbrook?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053072000 fall within Woodbrook (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053072000?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,539 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053072000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.14% of renter households, peaking at 12.7% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053072000 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.68× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053072000 compare to Fort Lewis overall?

Tract 53053072000 scores 6.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Fort Lewis at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Lewis; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fort Lewis

Top eight tracts in Fort Lewis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related