Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #12,919 of 84,120 nationally

Chambers Plateau Eviction Risk: Elevated , Lakewood

Tract 53053072105 · Pierce County, WA · pop 5,434 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 53053072105 covers part of the Chambers Plateau area of Lakewood, WA, and scores 7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,434 residents. At $2,500 a month, rents run 64% over what the rest of Lakewood commands.

Risk score
7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 9% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units2,037
Renter share15.9%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate15.2%
Median income$106,985

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Chambers Plateau
Moderate
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#9 of 13 tracts In Lakewood
Low
Within county
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#61 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Elevated
Within state
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#487 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lakewood and the region

Centroid at 47.1871, -122.5533 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chambers Plateau scores 7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lakewood
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
15.2% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$2,500 rent vs county FMR
7.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lakewood
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lakewood
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lakewood
6.8

How Chambers Plateau compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chambers Plateau risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.0This tracttract 0721056.6Lakewoodparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county5.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 27Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 1.00%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.9%Peak (2007)
  • 3Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 53053072105
Filings climbed 200% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 6Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.35×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chambers Plateau

The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.4/10. Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

The voucher gap is 21.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Against the Pierce County average of 5.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points.

On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.2/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 7.2/10.

Court records carry 27 eviction filings across 10 observed years. The worst year on record was 2007, when 1.9% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 1.0% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 85th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 16% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 4.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the WA average is 5.9, so this tract runs 1.1 points hotter. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 45% of renters.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053072105

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053072105?

Census tract 53053072105 in the Chambers Plateau neighborhood scores 7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053072105?

Median gross rent is $2,500/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053072105?

15.2% of residents in tract 53053072105 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,434.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053072105?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 70th, minority 54th, housing 39th.
Q5

Is tract 53053072105 considered part of Chambers Plateau?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053072105 fall within Chambers Plateau (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053072105?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 27 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 53053072105 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.00% of renter households, peaking at 1.9% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053072105 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.35× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053072105 compare to Lakewood overall?

Tract 53053072105 scores 7/10, higher than the parent city of Lakewood at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lakewood eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lakewood

Top eight tracts in Lakewood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related