Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #57,812 of 84,120 nationally

Pasadera Neighborhod Eviction Risk: Lower , Bunk Foss

Tract 53061052607 · Snohomish County, WA · pop 6,776 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

With a score of 3.5/10, tract 53061052607 in the Pasadera Neighborhod area of Bunk Foss, WA reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,776 residents. 26% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 7% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,995
Renter share11.5%
SVI overall0.12
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$146,797

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Pasadera Neighborhod
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Bunk Foss
Very High
Within county
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#149 of 173 tracts In Snohomish County
Very Low
Within state
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#1,592 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bunk Foss and the region

Centroid at 47.9688, -122.0745 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pasadera Neighborhod scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bunk Foss
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$2,837 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bunk Foss
2.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bunk Foss
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bunk Foss
2.9

How Pasadera Neighborhod compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pasadera Neighborhod risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.5This tracttract 0526074.1Bunk Fossparent city5.4Countyavg tract in county5.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 12

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 17Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 1.45%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.9%Peak (2015)
  • 2Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2008 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 53061052607
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Pasadera Neighborhod. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pasadera Neighborhod

Against the Snohomish County average of 5.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.9 points. The clearest offset is economic stress at 2.1/10. Against Snohomish County at 47.3%, 38% of renters here are cost-burdened.

On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 2.6/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 17 filings here across 5 tracked years.

Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 2.9/10. The worst year on record was 2015, when 2.9% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.4% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #57,812 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 11% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.1/10. Statewide the WA average is 5.9, so this tract runs 2.4 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Average gross rent is $2,837, close to the Bunk Foss average.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 53061052607

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061052607?

Census tract 53061052607 in the Pasadera Neighborhod neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53061052607?

Median gross rent is $2,837/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53061052607?

8.6% of residents in tract 53061052607 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,776.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53061052607?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 12th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 37th, minority 39th, housing 11th.
Q5

Is tract 53061052607 considered part of Pasadera Neighborhod?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53061052607 fall within Pasadera Neighborhod (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53061052607?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 17 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 53061052607 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.45% of renter households, peaking at 2.9% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 53061052607 compare to Bunk Foss overall?

Tract 53061052607 scores 3.5/10, lower than the parent city of Bunk Foss at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bunk Foss; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Bunk Foss

Top eight tracts in Bunk Foss ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related