Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally

Pasadera Neighborhod Eviction Risk: Lower , Bunk Foss

Tract 53061052504 · Snohomish County, WA · pop 3,037 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

The Lower-tier score of 3.7/10 for census tract 53061052504 reflects conditions in Pasadera Neighborhod in Bunk Foss, Washington. It lands near the 7th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 15% of renter households, a modest level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,682 a month against an average household income of $147,569 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 12% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 10% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,101
Renter share11.9%
SVI overall0.20
Poverty rate4.6%
Median income$147,569

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Pasadera Neighborhod
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Bunk Foss
Very Low
Within county
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#158 of 173 tracts In Snohomish County
Very Low
Within state
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#1,711 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bunk Foss and the region

Centroid at 47.9658, -122.1113 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pasadera Neighborhod scores 1.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bunk Foss
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
4.6% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$2,682 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bunk Foss
2.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bunk Foss
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bunk Foss
2.9

How Pasadera Neighborhod compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pasadera Neighborhod risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.51.5This tracttract 052504Bunk Foss: 6.76.7Bunk Fossparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 20

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 11Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 1.75%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.6%Peak (2015)
  • 2Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2008 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530610525042008: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2014: 2 filings (1.05/100 renter HHs)2015: 5 filings (2.63/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (1.65/100 renter HHs)2017: 2 filings (1.65/100 renter HHs)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Pasadera Neighborhod. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pasadera Neighborhod

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 5.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Bunk Foss, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Snohomish County average of 5.2 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 11 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 1.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.6% of renter households in 2015.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 20th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 53061052504

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061052504?

Census tract 53061052504 in the Pasadera Neighborhod neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53061052504?

Median gross rent is $2,682/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53061052504?

4.6% of residents in tract 53061052504 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,037.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53061052504?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 20th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 7th, minority 37th, housing 46th.
Q5

Is tract 53061052504 considered part of Pasadera Neighborhod?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53061052504 fall within Pasadera Neighborhod (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53061052504?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 11 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 53061052504 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.75% of renter households, peaking at 2.6% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 53061052504 compare to Bunk Foss overall?

Tract 53061052504 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Bunk Foss at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bunk Foss; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Bunk Foss

Top eight tracts in Bunk Foss ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related