Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 53067012532 Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 53067012532 · Thurston County, WA · pop 3,211

Census tract 53067012532 covers part of Thurston County, WA, and scores 4.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,211 residents. Against Thurston County at 47.2%, 12% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 10% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,290
Renter share11.5%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate9.4%
Median income$126,207

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#55 of 61 tracts In Thurston County
Very Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#1,456 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#47,371 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Thurston County and the region

Centroid at 46.8980, -122.5641 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 53067012532 scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
9.4% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,213 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
State baseline
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 53067012532 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 53067012532 risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.1This tracttract 0125325.8Countyavg tract in county5.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 15

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 53067012532

Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1.6/10. Against the Thurston County average of 5.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.7 points.

On the softer side, court filing pressure reads 2.2/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 2.3/10.

Severe burden reaches 12%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the national scale it lands near the 44th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 12% of average household income of $126,207, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Statewide the WA average is 5.9, so this tract runs 1.8 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Average gross rent runs $1,213 a month.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 53067012532

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53067012532?

Census tract 53067012532 in Thurston County scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53067012532?

Median gross rent is $1,213/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 12% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53067012532?

9.4% of residents in tract 53067012532 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,211.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53067012532?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 17th, minority 32th, housing 30th.
Related