Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #32,735 of 84,120 nationally

Charleston Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 54039000300 · Kanawha County, WV · pop 2,879 · 82% of tract blocks fall in Charleston

Charleston is where census tract 54039000300 sits, home to 2,879 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 3.9/10. That is riskier than about 10% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 35% of renter households, a high level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $911 monthly, set against $56,951 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 14% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,095
Renter share21.7%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate17.7%
Median income$56,951

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#10 of 20 tracts In Charleston
Moderate
Within county
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 57 tracts In Kanawha County
Elevated
Within state
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#236 of 546 tracts In West Virginia
Elevated
National
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#32,735 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Charleston and the region

Centroid at 38.3919, -81.6340 · click any tract to drill in

Why Charleston scores 4.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Charleston
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
West Virginia legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
17.7% poverty · this tract
4.4
Supply constraint
$911 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Charleston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Charleston
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Charleston
2.5

How Charleston compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Charleston risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.54.5This tracttract 000300Charleston: 3.03.0Charlestonparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 34

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Charleston

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 4.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Charleston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Kanawha County average of 4.3 and below the West Virginia statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 34th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 13.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 54039000300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 54039000300?

Census tract 54039000300 in Charleston scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 54039000300?

Median gross rent is $911/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 54039000300?

17.7% of residents in tract 54039000300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,879.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 54039000300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 13th, minority 11th, housing 41th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 54039000300 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 54039000300 compare to Charleston overall?

Tract 54039000300 scores 4.5/10, higher than the parent city of Charleston at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Charleston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 54039000300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 2% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Charleston

Top eight tracts in Charleston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related