Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally

Vandalia Eviction Risk: Moderate , Charleston

Tract 54039000600 · Kanawha County, WV · pop 3,617 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

With a score of 4.1/10, tract 54039000600 in the Vandalia area of Charleston, WV reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 19% Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,631
Renter share34.3%
SVI overall0.48
Poverty rate21.6%
Median income$51,789

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Vandalia
Very Low
Within parent city
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#8 of 20 tracts In Charleston
Elevated
Within county
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#22 of 57 tracts In Kanawha County
Elevated
Within state
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#178 of 546 tracts In West Virginia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Charleston and the region

Centroid at 38.3731, -81.6513 · click any tract to drill in

Why Vandalia scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Charleston
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
West Virginia legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
21.6% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$956 rent vs county FMR
4.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Charleston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Charleston
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Charleston
2.5

How Vandalia compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Vandalia risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.1This tracttract 0006003.2Charlestonparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 48

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Vandalia. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Vandalia

The severe-burden share is 24%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

Against Kanawha County at 36.9%, 45% of renters here are cost-burdened. Disability prevalence runs 45.1% against 31.5% nationally. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 2/10.

The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Food insecurity runs 27.3% against 17.8% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 44% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

It tracks the Kanawha County average of 3.9 closely. Average gross rent is $956, close to the Charleston average.

Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $51,789.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 54039000600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 54039000600?

Census tract 54039000600 in the Vandalia neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 54039000600?

Median gross rent is $956/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 54039000600?

21.6% of residents in tract 54039000600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,617.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 54039000600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 46th, minority 45th, housing 40th.
Q5

Is tract 54039000600 considered part of Vandalia?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 54039000600 fall within Vandalia (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 54039000600 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 54039000600 compare to Charleston overall?

Tract 54039000600 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Charleston at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Charleston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 54039000600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 33% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Charleston

Top eight tracts in Charleston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related