Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Elk City Historic District Eviction Risk: Lower , Charleston

Tract 54039000500 · Kanawha County, WV · pop 2,017 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

54039000500 is a census tract in the Elk City Historic District area of Charleston, WV. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,017. 57% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Kanawha County average of 36.9%.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 15% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units987
Renter share34.2%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate8.7%
Median income$70,202

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Elk City Historic District
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 20 tracts In Charleston
Very Low
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#56 of 57 tracts In Kanawha County
Very Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#391 of 546 tracts In West Virginia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Charleston and the region

Centroid at 38.3668, -81.6324 · click any tract to drill in

Why Elk City Historic District scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Charleston
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
West Virginia legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
8.7% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$896 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Charleston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Charleston
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Charleston
2.5

How Elk City Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Elk City Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0005003.2Charlestonparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 59

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Elk City Historic District

30% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 2/10. It sits 0.9 points below the Kanawha County average of 3.9. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Charleston. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.3/10. Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $70,202, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $896, close to the Charleston average.

34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 54039000500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 54039000500?

Census tract 54039000500 in the Elk City Historic District neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 54039000500?

Median gross rent is $896/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 54039000500?

8.7% of residents in tract 54039000500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,017.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 54039000500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 27th, minority 34th, housing 81th.
Q5

Is tract 54039000500 considered part of Elk City Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 54039000500 fall within Elk City Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 54039000500 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 54039000500 compare to Charleston overall?

Tract 54039000500 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Charleston at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Charleston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 54039000500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 7% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Charleston

Top eight tracts in Charleston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related