Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally

South Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Charleston

Tract 54039002000 · Kanawha County, WV · pop 2,849 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 54039002000 covers South Hills in Charleston in West Virginia. Home to 2,849 residents, it scores 3.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 6th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 35% of renter households, a high level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $997 a month while the average household earns $77,554 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. Renters make up 20% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 13% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,371
Renter share20.4%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate6.2%
Median income$77,554

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In South Hills
Very Low
Within parent city
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#16 of 20 tracts In Charleston
Low
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#46 of 57 tracts In Kanawha County
Very Low
Within state
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#424 of 546 tracts In West Virginia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Charleston and the region

Centroid at 38.3423, -81.6465 · click any tract to drill in

Why South Hills scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Charleston
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
West Virginia legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
6.2% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$997 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Charleston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Charleston
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Charleston
2.5

How South Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
South Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 002000Charleston: 3.03.0Charlestonparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 21

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within South Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in South Hills

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 4.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Charleston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Kanawha County average of 4.3 and below the West Virginia statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 21st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 54039002000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 54039002000?

Census tract 54039002000 in the South Hills neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 54039002000?

Median gross rent is $997/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 54039002000?

6.2% of residents in tract 54039002000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,849.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 54039002000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 61th, minority 24th, housing 7th.
Q5

Is tract 54039002000 considered part of South Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 54039002000 fall within South Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 54039002000 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 54039002000 compare to Charleston overall?

Tract 54039002000 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Charleston at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Charleston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 54039002000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 13% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Charleston

Top eight tracts in Charleston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related