Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Forest Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Charleston

Tract 54039002100 · Kanawha County, WV · pop 5,370 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 54039002100 covers part of the Forest Hills area of Charleston, WV, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,370 residents. 21% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Kanawha County average of 36.9%.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 20% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units2,042
Renter share24.9%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate10.2%
Median income$80,500

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Forest Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 20 tracts In Charleston
Low
Within county
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#41 of 57 tracts In Kanawha County
Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#391 of 546 tracts In West Virginia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Charleston and the region

Centroid at 38.3498, -81.6639 · click any tract to drill in

Why Forest Hills scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Charleston
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
West Virginia legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
10.2% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,063 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Charleston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Charleston
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Charleston
2.5

How Forest Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Forest Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0021003.2Charlestonparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 28

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Forest Hills

The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2/10.

Average gross rent is $1,063, 17% above the Charleston average. The severe-burden share is 9%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. It sits 0.9 points below the Kanawha County average of 3.9.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 25% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 3.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $80,500, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 54039002100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 54039002100?

Census tract 54039002100 in the Forest Hills neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 54039002100?

Median gross rent is $1,063/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 54039002100?

10.2% of residents in tract 54039002100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,370.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 54039002100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 76th, minority 27th, housing 33th.
Q5

Is tract 54039002100 considered part of Forest Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 54039002100 fall within Forest Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 54039002100 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 54039002100 compare to Charleston overall?

Tract 54039002100 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Charleston at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Charleston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 54039002100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Charleston

Top eight tracts in Charleston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related