Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Estabrook Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Shorewood

Tract 55079070200 · Milwaukee County, WI · pop 5,215 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Census tract 55079070200 covers part of the Estabrook Park area of Whitefish Bay, WI, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,215. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 3% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units1,754
Renter share3.4%
SVI overall0.05
Poverty rate3.9%
Median income$225,469

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Estabrook Park
Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Shorewood
Moderate
Within county
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#253 of 301 tracts In Milwaukee County
Very Low
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#1,083 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Shorewood and the region

Centroid at 43.1142, -87.8945 · click any tract to drill in

Why Estabrook Park scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Shorewood
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.0
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
3.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,375 rent vs county FMR
5.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Shorewood
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Shorewood
4.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Shorewood
3.2

How Estabrook Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Estabrook Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 070200Shorewood: 4.64.6Shorewoodparent cityCounty: 4.54.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 5

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 11Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 1.82%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.2%Peak (2003)
  • 2Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 550790702002003: 5 filings (4.18/100 renter HHs)2004: 1 filings (0.84/100 renter HHs)2007: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2008: 1 filings (2.97/100 renter HHs)2009: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2010: 1 filings (0.99/100 renter HHs)2011: 1 filings (0.65/100 renter HHs)2012: 2 filings (1.30/100 renter HHs)2013: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2014: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2017: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.83×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Milwaukee, WI as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Estabrook Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Estabrook Park

Disability prevalence runs 17.0% against 31.5% nationally. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.1/10.

Food insecurity runs 3.8% against 17.8% nationally. It sits 1.5 points below the Milwaukee County average of 4.5.

Running hot, local political climate reads 7.3/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 11 filings here across 6 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2003 at 4.2% of renter households.

This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Milwaukee Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 1.8% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 3% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 1.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 7% of average household income of $225,469, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 55079070200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55079070200?

Census tract 55079070200 in the Estabrook Park neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 55079070200?

Median gross rent is $1,375/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 55079070200?

3.9% of residents in tract 55079070200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,215.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 55079070200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 5th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 44th, minority 14th, housing 15th.
Q5

Is tract 55079070200 considered part of Estabrook Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55079070200 fall within Estabrook Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55079070200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 11 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 55079070200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.82% of renter households, peaking at 4.2% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 55079070200 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.83× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Milwaukee eviction risk, WI), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 55079070200 struggle to pay rent?

About 3.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 55079070200 compare to Shorewood overall?

Tract 55079070200 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Shorewood at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Shorewood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 55079070200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Shorewood

Top eight tracts in Shorewood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related