Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

Six Points Eviction Risk: Lower , West Allis

Tract 55079100100 · Milwaukee County, WI · pop 3,842 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 55079100100 covers part of the Six Points area of West Allis, WI, and scores 3.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,842. 31% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Milwaukee County average of 45.8%.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 32% Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units1,543
Renter share46.5%
SVI overall0.56
Poverty rate8.3%
Median income$66,993

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In Six Points
Very Low
Within parent city
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#11 of 18 tracts In West Allis
Moderate
Within county
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#221 of 301 tracts In Milwaukee County
Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#923 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across West Allis and the region

Centroid at 43.0166, -87.9860 · click any tract to drill in

Why Six Points scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from West Allis
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.0
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
8.3% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,054 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from West Allis
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from West Allis
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from West Allis
4.6

How Six Points compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Six Points risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 100100West Allis: 4.14.1West Allisparent cityCounty: 4.54.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 56

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 457Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 4.37%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.8%Peak (2011)
  • 35Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 550791001002003: 30 filings (4.06/100 renter HHs)2004: 36 filings (4.87/100 renter HHs)2007: 38 filings (4.74/100 renter HHs)2008: 35 filings (4.37/100 renter HHs)2009: 36 filings (4.49/100 renter HHs)2010: 32 filings (4.21/100 renter HHs)2011: 41 filings (4.82/100 renter HHs)2012: 30 filings (3.53/100 renter HHs)2013: 35 filings (4.12/100 renter HHs)2014: 35 filings (4.12/100 renter HHs)2015: 35 filings (4.12/100 renter HHs)2016: 39 filings (4.92/100 renter HHs)2017: 35 filings (4.41/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 17% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 129Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.63×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (1.25× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2020-07-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 3 filings (1.15× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (1.36× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (1.36× baseline)2022-05-01: 6 filings (1.58× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2022-07-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (1.92× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (1.15× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (1.11× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (0.63× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (1.11× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (1.92× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (0.79× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Milwaukee, WI as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Six Points. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Six Points

The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 8.7/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.1/10. Severe burden reaches 16%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

On the softer side, economic stress reads 2.1/10. Against the Milwaukee County average of 4.5, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points. Court records carry 457 eviction filings across 13 observed years.

Filings peaked in 2011 at 4.8% of renter households. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Milwaukee Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 4.4% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 27th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 6.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 55079100100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55079100100?

Census tract 55079100100 in the Six Points neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 55079100100?

Median gross rent is $1,054/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 55079100100?

8.3% of residents in tract 55079100100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,842.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 55079100100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 56th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 88th, minority 63th, housing 39th.
Q5

Is tract 55079100100 considered part of Six Points?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55079100100 fall within Six Points (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55079100100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 457 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 55079100100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.37% of renter households, peaking at 4.8% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 55079100100 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.63× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Milwaukee eviction risk, WI), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 55079100100 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 55079100100 compare to West Allis overall?

Tract 55079100100 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of West Allis at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from West Allis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 55079100100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 26% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in West Allis

Top eight tracts in West Allis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related