Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,414 of 84,120 nationally

Bluemound Manor Eviction Risk: Lower , Milwaukee

Tract 55079100700 · Milwaukee County, WI · pop 2,914 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

55079100700 is a census tract in the Bluemound Manor area of West Allis, WI. It scores 3.1/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,914. 34% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 7% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,184
Renter share13.6%
SVI overall0.48
Poverty rate9.3%
Median income$80,333

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Bluemound Manor
Very Low
Within parent city
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 18 tracts In Milwaukee
Low
Within county
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#239 of 301 tracts In Milwaukee County
Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#1,029 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Milwaukee and the region

Centroid at 43.0213, -88.0379 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bluemound Manor scores 3.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Milwaukee
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.0
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
9.3% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,438 rent vs county FMR
6.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Milwaukee
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Milwaukee
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Milwaukee
4.6

How Bluemound Manor compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Bluemound Manor risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.13.1This tracttract 100700Milwaukee: 4.44.4Milwaukeeparent cityCounty: 4.54.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 48

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 56Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 2.78%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.7%Peak (2012)
  • 7Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 550791007002003: 6 filings (4.55/100 renter HHs)2004: 2 filings (1.52/100 renter HHs)2007: 2 filings (2.06/100 renter HHs)2008: 6 filings (6.19/100 renter HHs)2009: 5 filings (5.15/100 renter HHs)2010: 1 filings (0.71/100 renter HHs)2011: 3 filings (1.43/100 renter HHs)2012: 12 filings (5.71/100 renter HHs)2013: 2 filings (0.95/100 renter HHs)2014: 1 filings (0.48/100 renter HHs)2015: 2 filings (0.95/100 renter HHs)2016: 7 filings (3.21/100 renter HHs)2017: 7 filings (3.21/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 17% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 28Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.97×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (3.33× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Milwaukee, WI as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Bluemound Manor. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bluemound Manor

At $1,438 a month, rents run 43% over what the rest of West Allis commands. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 8.7/10.

Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.1/10. It sits 1.4 points below the Milwaukee County average of 4.5.

Running cool, economic stress reads 2.3/10. The filing record is not thin: 56 evictions over 13 years of observation.

The voucher gap is 14.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Filings peaked in 2012 at 5.7% of renter households. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Milwaukee Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 2.8% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 22% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Social vulnerability reads 5.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. 49% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 55079100700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55079100700?

Census tract 55079100700 in the Bluemound Manor neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 55079100700?

Median gross rent is $1,438/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 55079100700?

9.3% of residents in tract 55079100700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,914.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 55079100700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 48th, minority 42th, housing 59th.
Q5

Is tract 55079100700 considered part of Bluemound Manor?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55079100700 fall within Bluemound Manor (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55079100700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 56 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 55079100700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.78% of renter households, peaking at 5.7% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 55079100700 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.97× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Milwaukee eviction risk, WI), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 55079100700 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 55079100700 compare to Milwaukee overall?

Tract 55079100700 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Milwaukee at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Milwaukee eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 55079100700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 50% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Milwaukee

Top eight tracts in Milwaukee ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related