Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally

South Towne Eviction Risk: Moderate , Cudahy

Tract 55079180500 · Milwaukee County, WI · pop 4,380 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Tract 55079180500 sits in the South Towne area of Cudahy eviction risk, WI, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.1/10. It is home to 4,380 residents. Severe burden reaches 29%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 15% Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units2,145
Renter share22.2%
SVI overall0.45
Poverty rate17.9%
Median income$71,378

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In South Towne
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Cudahy
Very High
Within county
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#178 of 301 tracts In Milwaukee County
Moderate
Within state
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#558 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cudahy and the region

Centroid at 42.9373, -87.8747 · click any tract to drill in

Why South Towne scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cudahy
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.0
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
17.9% poverty · this tract
4.5
Supply constraint
$997 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cudahy
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cudahy
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cudahy
5.2

How South Towne compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
South Towne risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.14.1This tracttract 180500Cudahy: 4.04.0Cudahyparent cityCounty: 4.54.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 45

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 441Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 6.06%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.3%Peak (2007)
  • 35Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 550791805002003: 16 filings (2.92/100 renter HHs)2004: 24 filings (4.38/100 renter HHs)2007: 45 filings (8.32/100 renter HHs)2008: 43 filings (7.95/100 renter HHs)2009: 37 filings (6.84/100 renter HHs)2010: 30 filings (4.80/100 renter HHs)2011: 37 filings (6.93/100 renter HHs)2012: 34 filings (6.37/100 renter HHs)2013: 36 filings (6.74/100 renter HHs)2014: 39 filings (7.30/100 renter HHs)2015: 33 filings (6.18/100 renter HHs)2016: 32 filings (4.78/100 renter HHs)2017: 35 filings (5.23/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 119% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 40Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.19×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.26× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.26× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.26× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (1.11× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Milwaukee, WI as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within South Towne. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in South Towne

Against Milwaukee County at 45.8%, roughly one in three of renters here are cost-burdened. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 8.1/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.8/10.

Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.3/10. Court records carry 441 eviction filings across 13 observed years.

Filings peaked in 2007 at 8.3% of renter households. In a typical year about 6.1% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 44% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 22% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $71,378, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 55079180500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55079180500?

Census tract 55079180500 in the South Towne neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 55079180500?

Median gross rent is $997/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 55079180500?

17.9% of residents in tract 55079180500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,380.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 55079180500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 45th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 77th, minority 24th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 55079180500 considered part of South Towne?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55079180500 fall within South Towne (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55079180500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 441 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 55079180500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.06% of renter households, peaking at 8.3% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 55079180500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.19× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Milwaukee eviction risk, WI), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 55079180500 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 55079180500 compare to Cudahy overall?

Tract 55079180500 scores 4.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Cudahy at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cudahy eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cudahy

Top eight tracts in Cudahy ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related