Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #72,539 of 84,120 nationally
Baehmann's Par 3 Course Eviction Risk: Lower , Cedarburg
Tract 55089650102 · Ozaukee County, WI · pop 2,664 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Census tract 55089650102 belongs to the Baehmann's Par 3 Course neighborhood of Cedarburg, Wisconsin. It is home to 2,664 residents and scores 3.7/10, a lower reading for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #78,389 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
38% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,062 a month against an average household income of $82,391 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. Renters make up 36% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,278
Renter share35.6%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate4.1%
Median income$82,391
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
75
th percentile
High
Within county
65
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
19
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cedarburg and the region
Centroid at 43.3031, -87.9979 · click any tract to drill in
Why Baehmann's Par 3 Course scores 2.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cedarburg
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
4.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,062 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cedarburg
4.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cedarburg
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cedarburg
3.4
How Baehmann's Par 3 Course compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 31%Socioeconomic
- 41%Household composition
- 14%Racial/ethnic minority
- 29%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 9Total filings over 8 yrs
- 0.32%Avg annual filing rate
- 0.6%Peak (2003)
- 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Baehmann's Par 3 Course. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.7%Housing insecurity
- 3.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.3%Food insecurity
- 6.2%SNAP enrollment
- 4.1%Transit barriers
- 4.5%No health insurance
- 13.3%Frequent mental distress
- 23.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Baehmann's Par 3 Course
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 7.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cedarburg, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Ozaukee County average of 3.7 and below the Wisconsin statewide average of 4.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 9 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 0.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 0.6% of renter households in 2003.
In CDC survey modeling, about 5.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 55089650102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55089650102?
Census tract 55089650102 in the Baehmann's Par 3 Course neighborhood scores 2.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 55089650102?
Median gross rent is $1,062/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 55089650102?
4.1% of residents in tract 55089650102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,664.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 55089650102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 41th, minority 14th, housing 29th.
Q5
Is tract 55089650102 considered part of Baehmann's Par 3 Course?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55089650102 fall within Baehmann's Par 3 Course (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55089650102?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 9 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 55089650102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.32% of renter households, peaking at 0.6% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 55089650102 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 55089650102 compare to Cedarburg overall?
Tract 55089650102 scores 2.1/10, lower than the parent city of Cedarburg at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cedarburg; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cedarburg
Top eight tracts in Cedarburg ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related