Baehmann's Par 3 Course Eviction Risk: Lower , Cedarburg

The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 32.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Cost burden runs 49% here against 37.1% across Ozaukee County.

On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.2/10. Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 1.9/10.

Food insecurity runs 6.0% against 17.8% nationally. The severe-burden share is 13%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.2% against 11.3% nationally.

On the national scale it lands near the 27th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 10% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Social vulnerability reads 1.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Ozaukee County average of 3.7 closely.

Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $104,907.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.