Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally

Chattanooga Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 47065010901 · Hamilton County, TN · pop 2,330 · 76% of tract blocks fall in Chattanooga

Census tract 47065010901 covers part of Chattanooga, TN, and scores 3.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 47% Owners 22%
Tract context
Occupied units1,132
Renter share77.7%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$73,625

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#41 of 54 tracts In Chattanooga
Low
Within county
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#54 of 87 tracts In Hamilton County
Low
Within state
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#960 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
Moderate
National
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#59,654 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chattanooga and the region

Centroid at 35.0570, -85.3351 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chattanooga scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chattanooga
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,679 rent vs county FMR
6.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chattanooga
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chattanooga
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chattanooga
3.0

How Chattanooga compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chattanooga risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.4This tracttract 0109013.5Chattanoogaparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 22

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chattanooga

Average gross rent is $1,679, 34% above the Chattanooga average. 78% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.9/10.

15% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The voucher gap is 17.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.5/10.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chattanooga. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 29th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.9/10.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. 39% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Hamilton County average of 3.9 closely.

Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $73,625.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 47065010901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47065010901?

Census tract 47065010901 in Chattanooga scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 47065010901?

Median gross rent is $1,679/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 47065010901?

10.1% of residents in tract 47065010901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,330.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 47065010901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 1th, minority 33th, housing 70th.
Q5

How does tract 47065010901 compare to Chattanooga overall?

Tract 47065010901 scores 3.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Chattanooga at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chattanooga eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q6

Was tract 47065010901 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chattanooga

Top eight tracts in Chattanooga ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related