Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Trails End Eviction Risk: Lower , Karns
Tract 47093004612 ·
Knox County, TN · pop 2,950 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 47093004612 in the Trails End area of Knox County, TN reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 18% here against 40.9% across Knox County.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%Stable renters 27%Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units1,315
Renter share33.5%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate6.4%
Median income$107,463
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In Trails End
Very High
Within county
20th percentile
#97 of 121 tracts In Knox County
Low
Within state
31th percentile
#1,176 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
Low
National
20th percentile
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Karns and the region
Centroid at 35.9432, -84.1154 · click any tract to drill in
Why Trails End scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Karns
1.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
6.4% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,413 rent vs county FMR
4.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Karns
1.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Karns
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Karns
5.0
How Trails End compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 22
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
20%Socioeconomic
15%Household composition
36%Racial/ethnic minority
44%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Trails End. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.6/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.9/10. The severe-burden share is 18%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Running cool, local political climate reads 1.9/10. It sits 0.7 points below the Knox County average of 3.7. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3/10. Against average income of $107,463, annual rent is just 16%. Statewide the TN average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Model confidence here is 65%, lower than typical because some ACS inputs for this tract carry wide margins of error, so read the score as a band, not a point.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 47093004612
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47093004612?
Census tract 47093004612 in the Trails End neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 47093004612?
Median gross rent is $1,413/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 18% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 47093004612?
6.4% of residents in tract 47093004612 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,950.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 47093004612?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 15th, minority 36th, housing 44th.
Q5
Is tract 47093004612 considered part of Trails End?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 47093004612 fall within Trails End (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How does tract 47093004612 compare to Karns overall?
Tract 47093004612 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Karns at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Karns; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.