Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Live Oak Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48029121606 · Bexar, TX · pop 4,094 · 92% of tract blocks fall in Live Oak

Census tract 48029121606 runs through Live Oak. With 4,094 residents, it scores 5.4/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 52% of US census tracts.

49% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,412 a month against an average household income of $61,917 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. About 45% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 23% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units2,082
Renter share45.3%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate5.5%
Median income$61,917

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Live Oak
Very High
Within county
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#326 of 375 tracts In Bexar
Very Low
Within state
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#5,145 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#63,481 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Live Oak and the region

Centroid at 29.5565, -98.3365 · click any tract to drill in

Why Live Oak scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Live Oak
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
5.5% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,412 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Live Oak
3.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Live Oak
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Live Oak
4.0

How Live Oak compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Live Oak risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 121606Live Oak: 2.22.2Live Oakparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 125Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 2.31%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.6%Peak (2007)
  • 24Filings in 2008 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2008
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 480291216062000: 6 filings (1.13/100 renter HHs)2001: 9 filings (1.69/100 renter HHs)2002: 9 filings (1.69/100 renter HHs)2003: 9 filings (1.69/100 renter HHs)2004: 12 filings (2.26/100 renter HHs)2005: 8 filings (1.24/100 renter HHs)2006: 18 filings (2.78/100 renter HHs)2007: 30 filings (4.63/100 renter HHs)2008: 24 filings (3.71/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 300% over the past 9 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Live Oak

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Live Oak, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Bexar County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 125 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 2.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.6% of renter households in 2007.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 36th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48029121606

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48029121606?

Census tract 48029121606 in Live Oak scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48029121606?

Median gross rent is $1,412/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48029121606?

5.5% of residents in tract 48029121606 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,094.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48029121606?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 45th, minority 69th, housing 10th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48029121606?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 125 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 48029121606 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.31% of renter households, peaking at 4.6% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 48029121606 compare to Live Oak overall?

Tract 48029121606 scores 2.7/10, higher than the parent city of Live Oak at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Live Oak; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Live Oak

Top eight tracts in Live Oak ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related