Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Knox Eviction Risk: Lower , Dallas

Tract 48113019800 · Dallas, TX · pop 4,854 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 48113019800 in the Knox area of Highland Park, TX reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,854 residents. The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 8% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,723
Renter share13.1%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate4.3%
Median income$243,893

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Knox
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Dallas
Very Low
Within county
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#455 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,505 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.8295, -96.8100 · click any tract to drill in

Why Knox scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
4.3% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$3,150 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
3.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
4.0

How Knox compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Knox risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 019800Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 3

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 81Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 1.39%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.5%Peak (2011)
  • 4Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130198002000: 4 filings (1.27/100 renter HHs)2001: 5 filings (1.59/100 renter HHs)2002: 6 filings (1.91/100 renter HHs)2003: 1 filings (0.32/100 renter HHs)2004: 5 filings (1.59/100 renter HHs)2005: 8 filings (2.71/100 renter HHs)2006: 7 filings (2.37/100 renter HHs)2007: 3 filings (1.02/100 renter HHs)2008: 2 filings (0.68/100 renter HHs)2009: 3 filings (1.02/100 renter HHs)2010: 4 filings (1.29/100 renter HHs)2011: 12 filings (3.45/100 renter HHs)2012: 4 filings (1.15/100 renter HHs)2013: 4 filings (1.15/100 renter HHs)2014: 3 filings (0.86/100 renter HHs)2015: 2 filings (0.57/100 renter HHs)2016: 4 filings (1.03/100 renter HHs)2017: 4 filings (1.03/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 24Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.75×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Knox. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Knox

Average gross rent is $3,150, 62% above the Highland Park average. The voucher gap is 67.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Cost burden runs 35% here against 47.9% across Dallas County. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.1/10. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.2/10.

Severe burden reaches 16%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Court records carry 81 eviction filings across 18 observed years.

Against the Dallas County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. The worst year on record was 2011, when 3.5% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 1.4% of renter households face a filing.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113019800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113019800?

Census tract 48113019800 in the Knox neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113019800?

Median gross rent is $3,150/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113019800?

4.3% of residents in tract 48113019800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,854.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113019800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 25th, minority 11th, housing 4th.
Q5

Is tract 48113019800 considered part of Knox?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113019800 fall within Knox (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113019800?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 81 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113019800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.39% of renter households, peaking at 3.5% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48113019800 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.75× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48113019800 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113019800 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 48113019800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related