Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

University Park Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48113019502 · Dallas, TX · pop 4,074

Census tract 48113019502 covers part of University Park, TX, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Against Dallas County at 47.9%, 24% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 15% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,516
Renter share19.5%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate3.4%
Median income$250,001

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In University Park
Very High
Within county
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#458 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,505 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across University Park and the region

Centroid at 32.8446, -96.8063 · click any tract to drill in

Why University Park scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from University Park
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from University Park
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from University Park
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from University Park
5.3

How University Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
University Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 019502University Park: 4.04.0University Parkparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 165Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 1.48%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.5%Peak (2006)
  • 13Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130195022000: 5 filings (0.64/100 renter HHs)2001: 4 filings (0.51/100 renter HHs)2002: 12 filings (1.54/100 renter HHs)2003: 12 filings (1.54/100 renter HHs)2004: 9 filings (1.16/100 renter HHs)2005: 9 filings (1.42/100 renter HHs)2006: 16 filings (2.53/100 renter HHs)2007: 10 filings (1.58/100 renter HHs)2008: 12 filings (1.90/100 renter HHs)2009: 10 filings (1.58/100 renter HHs)2010: 12 filings (1.95/100 renter HHs)2011: 11 filings (1.90/100 renter HHs)2012: 6 filings (1.03/100 renter HHs)2013: 5 filings (0.86/100 renter HHs)2014: 9 filings (1.55/100 renter HHs)2015: 6 filings (1.03/100 renter HHs)2016: 4 filings (0.90/100 renter HHs)2017: 13 filings (2.93/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 160% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 32Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.50×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in University Park

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10. The voucher gap is 85.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10.

Severe burden reaches 24%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.2/10.

Disability prevalence runs 17.1% against 31.5% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 165 evictions over 18 years of observation. It sits 0.8 points below the Dallas County average of 3.8.

Filings peaked in 2006 at 2.5% of renter households. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Dallas. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 1.5% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 19% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113019502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113019502?

Census tract 48113019502 in University Park scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113019502?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113019502?

3.4% of residents in tract 48113019502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,074.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113019502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 48th, minority 25th, housing 9th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113019502?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 165 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113019502 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.48% of renter households, peaking at 2.5% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113019502 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.50× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113019502 compare to University Park overall?

Tract 48113019502 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of University Park at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from University Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48113019502 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in University Park

Top eight tracts in University Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related