Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

The Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Dallas

Tract 48113019301 · Dallas, TX · pop 3,403 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Tract 48113019301 sits in the The Village area of University Park, TX, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. It is home to 3,403 residents. 23% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Dallas County average of 47.9%.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 3% Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units990
Renter share3.9%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate1.1%
Median income$250,001

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 13 tracts In The Village
Elevated
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Dallas
High
Within county
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#462 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,505 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.8563, -96.7819 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Village scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
1.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,603 rent vs county FMR
8.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
5.3

How The Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 019301Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 4

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 21Total filings over 12 yrs
  • 4.41%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.2%Peak (2003)
  • 1Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130193012000: 1 filings (1.75/100 renter HHs)2001: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2002: 2 filings (3.50/100 renter HHs)2003: 3 filings (5.24/100 renter HHs)2004: 3 filings (5.24/100 renter HHs)2005: 3 filings (10.32/100 renter HHs)2006: 1 filings (3.44/100 renter HHs)2007: 2 filings (6.88/100 renter HHs)2008: 1 filings (3.44/100 renter HHs)2009: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2010: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2011: 1 filings (2.63/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (2.63/100 renter HHs)2013: 2 filings (5.26/100 renter HHs)2014: 1 filings (2.63/100 renter HHs)2015: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2017: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Village

The voucher gap is 38.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.8/10.

On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.2/10. Disability prevalence runs 17.3% against 31.5% nationally.

At $2,603 a month, rents run 20% under what the rest of University Park commands. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 21 filings here across 12 tracked years. Against the Dallas County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points.

Filings peaked in 2003 at 5.2% of renter households. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Dallas. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 4.4% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113019301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113019301?

Census tract 48113019301 in the The Village neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113019301?

Median gross rent is $2,603/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113019301?

1.1% of residents in tract 48113019301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,403.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113019301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 18th, minority 19th, housing 3th.
Q5

Is tract 48113019301 considered part of The Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113019301 fall within The Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113019301?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 21 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 48113019301 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.41% of renter households, peaking at 5.2% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 48113019301 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113019301 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48113019301 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related