Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,316 of 84,120 nationally

Mangum Place Eviction Risk: Moderate , Jacinto City

Tract 48201233702 · Harris, TX · pop 3,035 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

For landlords sizing up Mangum Place in Jacinto City, census tract 48201233702 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 5.9/10. That is riskier than about 70% of US census tracts.

34% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $941 a month against an average household income of $42,750 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 44% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 29% Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units814
Renter share44.2%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate32.7%
Median income$42,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Mangum Place
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Jacinto City
Very High
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#223 of 1,115 tracts In Harris
High
Within state
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#875 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Jacinto City and the region

Centroid at 29.7474, -95.2379 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mangum Place scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Jacinto City
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
32.7% poverty · this tract
8.2
Supply constraint
$941 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Jacinto City
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Jacinto City
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Jacinto City
7.4

How Mangum Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mangum Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.85.8This tracttract 233702Jacinto City: 2.42.4Jacinto Cityparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 74Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 3.09%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.3%Peak (2013)
  • 11Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 482012337022009: 10 filings (3.46/100 renter HHs)2010: 10 filings (2.85/100 renter HHs)2011: 12 filings (3.41/100 renter HHs)2012: 10 filings (2.84/100 renter HHs)2013: 15 filings (4.26/100 renter HHs)2014: 6 filings (1.70/100 renter HHs)2015: 11 filings (3.12/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 60Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.91×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (8.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (8.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Houston, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mangum Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mangum Place

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 8.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Jacinto City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Harris County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 74 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 3.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.3% of renter households in 2013.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 98th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48201233702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48201233702?

Census tract 48201233702 in the Mangum Place neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48201233702?

Median gross rent is $941/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48201233702?

32.7% of residents in tract 48201233702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,035.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48201233702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 100th, household 93th, minority 98th, housing 76th.
Q5

Is tract 48201233702 considered part of Mangum Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48201233702 fall within Mangum Place (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48201233702?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 74 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48201233702 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.09% of renter households, peaking at 4.3% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48201233702 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.91× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Houston eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48201233702 compare to Jacinto City overall?

Tract 48201233702 scores 5.8/10, higher than the parent city of Jacinto City at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Jacinto City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Jacinto City

Top eight tracts in Jacinto City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related