Skip to content
Amargosa, Texas eviction risk overview
City brief · 60 residents

Amargosa, TX Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Jim Wells County · Population 60

In 2026
Risk score
1.8
VERY LOW

6th percentile, Texas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average1.8 Now1.8
2.4 1.5 1976 · score 2.0 1977 · score 2.0 1978 · score 2.0 1979 · score 2.0 1980 · score 2.0 1981 · score 1.9 1982 · score 2.0 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.6 1985 · score 1.6 1986 · score 1.7 1987 · score 1.5 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.5 1991 · score 1.5 1992 · score 1.7 1993 · score 1.7 1994 · score 1.7 1995 · score 1.7 1996 · score 1.7 1997 · score 1.7 1998 · score 1.7 1999 · score 1.7 2000 · score 1.7 2001 · score 1.7 2002 · score 1.8 2003 · score 1.8 2004 · score 1.8 2005 · score 1.8 2006 · score 1.7 2007 · score 1.7 2008 · score 1.8 2009 · score 2.0 2010 · score 2.1 2011 · score 2.1 2012 · score 1.9 2013 · score 1.8 2014 · score 1.8 2015 · score 1.8 2016 · score 2.0 2017 · score 2.0 2018 · score 2.0 2019 · score 2.0 2020 · score 2.4 2021 · score 2.3 2022 · score 2.1 2023 · score 2.1 2024 · score 1.9 2025 · score 1.9 2026 · score 1.8

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.1 Regional 5.1 State 1.5 Economic 1.0 Supply 9.9 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 1.6 Tenant 9.9 Housing 1.3 1.8 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +15.5% (2024)
    5.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.1
  3. State political climate
    Texas legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    28.1% poverty · 6.0% unemp.
    1.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $956 average · 34.3% renters
    9.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    39.0% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    24 days filing → judgment
    1.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    34.3% renters
    9.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Amargosa and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Amargosa compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Jim Wells County
Low
#11 of 15 cities
Rank in county, 29th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 15 cities in Jim Wells County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Texas
Very Low
#1737 of 1,841 cities
Rank in state, 6th percentileLowHigh
#1737 of 1,841 cities in Texas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Amargosa risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Amargosa: 1.81.8AmargosaThis cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.8
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 24d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $956/mo. A contested eviction takes 24 days and costs $1,095–$3,377 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 34.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 60 residents, 34.3% rent. 39% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 28.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 5.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5.1 and 5.1 (GOP margin +15.5% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.6, housing court bias 1.3, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 1. Supply constraint: 9.9. The numbers behind those: 28.1% poverty, 6.0% unemployment, 39% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Amargosa sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston San Antonio, TX · 25d · ~$2.4k all-in ($94/day) · score 2.8 San Antonio Dallas, TX · 24d · ~$2.1k all-in ($89/day) · score 2.7 Dallas Austin, TX · 24d · ~$2.2k all-in ($92/day) · score 2.9 Austin Fort Worth, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.6 Fort Worth El Paso, TX · 24d · ~$2.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 3.1 El Paso Arlington, TX · 25d · ~$2.1k all-in ($83/day) · score 2.6 Arlington Corpus Christi, TX · 26d · ~$2.6k all-in ($98/day) · score 2.7 Corpus Christi Plano, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($87/day) · score 2.3 Plano Lubbock, TX · 23d · ~$2.5k all-in ($109/day) · score 2.7 Lubbock Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Amargosa
Amargosa · 24d · ~$2.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 1.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Amargosa, TX

Landlording in Amargosa, Texas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.8/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Amargosa is a city of 60 residents where 34.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 39.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $956/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Amargosa eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Amargosa closes 24 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Amargosa's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Amargosa runs $1,095 to $3,377 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 24 days of typical timeline and $956/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9.9/10 in Amargosa, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Texas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Amargosa: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Texas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,377 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Amargosa

Trap · PROPERTY CODE CHAPTER 24
The 3.9/10 score weighs nine sub-factors. The most relevant for landlords are court bias, eviction process difficulty, and supply constraint. See the sub-score breakdown above. State-level framework: Property Code Chapter 24.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my Amargosa tenant just disappears?

If a tenant abandons the property and leaves belongings, Texas law allows you to take possession under certain conditions. You must reasonably believe they've abandoned it and follow specific notice requirements for their property. Usually, a 30-day notice is sent to their last known address, giving them time to reclaim items. After that, you can dispose of or sell the property. Always document everything.
Q2

Can I change the locks on a tenant who hasn't paid rent?

No, absolutely not. This is a self-help eviction and is illegal in Texas. You could face significant penalties. You must follow the formal eviction process through the courts. The only time you can change locks is if the lease explicitly allows it for non-payment of rent, and even then, you must provide the tenant with a new key upon request, provided they pay the rent. It's safer to just avoid this entirely.
Q3

How do I handle a tenant who is constantly late but always pays?

Consistency is key. Your lease should outline late fees. Charge them every time. If you consistently waive late fees, you establish a precedent that can make it harder to enforce them later. If the late payments become a major issue, consider a non-renewal of the lease with proper 30-day notice when the lease term ends.
Q4

Do I need an attorney for every eviction in Amargosa?

Not necessarily, especially for clear-cut non-payment cases. However, an attorney significantly reduces the risk of procedural errors that can delay your case or even get it dismissed. If the tenant contests the eviction, claims repairs were not made, or has legal aid, an attorney is highly recommended. It's an investment that often saves money and time in the long run.
Q5

What are my responsibilities for repairs in Amargosa?

Under Texas law (Texas tenant protections), you are responsible for making repairs that materially affect the physical health or safety of an ordinary tenant, provided the tenant has given you proper written notice and the damage wasn't caused by them. You have a "reasonable" time to make repairs, typically seven days for critical issues. Failing to do so can give the tenant options, including breaking the lease or making repairs themselves and deducting the cost from rent (under specific, strict conditions).
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.8/10 places Amargosa in the 6th percentile of Texas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.