Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally
Hideaway Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48423001406 · Smith, TX · pop 5,541 · 45% of tract blocks fall in Hideaway
Census tract 48423001406 belongs to Hideaway, Texas. It is home to 5,541 residents and scores 4.6/10, a moderate reading for landlords. It lands near the 24th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 46% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,532 a month against an average household income of $90,405 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 10% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 5%
Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units2,289
Renter share10.1%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate3.4%
Median income$90,405
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
6
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
13
th percentile
Very Low
National
12
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hideaway and the region
Centroid at 32.4573, -95.4865 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hideaway scores 2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Hideaway
3.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,532 rent vs county FMR
6.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hideaway
4.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hideaway
2.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hideaway
3.5
How Hideaway compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 15
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 7%Socioeconomic
- 38%Household composition
- 17%Racial/ethnic minority
- 35%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hideaway
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 6.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hideaway, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Smith County average of 4.4 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 15th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 48423001406
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48423001406?
Census tract 48423001406 in Hideaway scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48423001406?
Median gross rent is $1,532/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48423001406?
3.4% of residents in tract 48423001406 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,541.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48423001406?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 38th, minority 17th, housing 35th.
Q5
How does tract 48423001406 compare to Hideaway overall?
Tract 48423001406 scores 2/10, right in line with the parent city of Hideaway at 1.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hideaway; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related