Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Cedar Bluffs Eviction Risk: Lower , North Logan
Tract 49005000402 ·
Cache, UT · pop 4,346 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 49005000402 in the Cedar Bluffs area of North Logan, UT reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,346. At $965 a month, rents run 42% under what the rest of North Logan commands.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%Stable renters 4%Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units1,325
Renter share4.0%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate5.4%
Median income$130,694
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Cedar Bluffs
Moderate
Within parent city
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In North Logan
Very Low
Within county
4th percentile
#27 of 28 tracts In Cache
Very Low
Within state
41th percentile
#425 of 716 tracts In Utah
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across North Logan and the region
Centroid at 41.7905, -111.7878 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cedar Bluffs scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Logan
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
5.4% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$965 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Logan
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Logan
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Logan
7.5
How Cedar Bluffs compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
4%Socioeconomic
6%Household composition
2%Racial/ethnic minority
4%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
10Total filings over 7 yrs
1.42%Avg annual filing rate
2.0%Peak (2011)
2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2006 to 2018
Filings dropped 100% over the past 11 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
5.6%Housing insecurity
4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
6.3%Food insecurity
3.2%SNAP enrollment
4.4%Transit barriers
5.4%No health insurance
13.8%Frequent mental distress
23.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cedar Bluffs
The clearest offset is court filing pressure at 0.9/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.4/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.4/10.
SNAP participation runs 3.2% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 6.3% against 17.8% nationally. Against the Cache County average of 3.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.9 points.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 10 filings here across 7 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2011 at 2.0% of renter households. In a typical year about 1.4% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 4% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 49005000402
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49005000402?
Census tract 49005000402 in the Cedar Bluffs neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49005000402?
Median gross rent is $965/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49005000402?
5.4% of residents in tract 49005000402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,346.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49005000402?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 6th, minority 2th, housing 4th.
Q5
Is tract 49005000402 considered part of Cedar Bluffs?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49005000402 fall within Cedar Bluffs (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49005000402?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 10 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49005000402 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.42% of renter households, peaking at 2.0% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 49005000402 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 49005000402 compare to North Logan overall?
Tract 49005000402 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of North Logan at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Logan eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in North Logan
Top eight tracts in North Logan ranked by composite eviction-risk score.