Marmalade District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Salt Lake City
Tract 49035100800 · Salt Lake, UT · pop 2,502 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
With a score of 5.4/10, tract 49035100800 in the Marmalade District area of Salt Lake City, UT reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,502. 27% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Salt Lake County average of 42.4%.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Salt Lake City and the region
Centroid at 40.7730, -111.8929 · click any tract to drill in
Why Marmalade District scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Marmalade District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 59
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 39%Socioeconomic
- 48%Household composition
- 38%Racial/ethnic minority
- 89%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 18%Grade B
- 66%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 94Total filings over 9 yrs
- 0.99%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.6%Peak (2008)
- 7Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Marmalade District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.6%Housing insecurity
- 6.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.1%Food insecurity
- 6.5%SNAP enrollment
- 7.3%Transit barriers
- 9.7%No health insurance
- 17.7%Frequent mental distress
- 28.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Marmalade District
79% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The main counterweight is state political climate at 1.9/10. Against the Salt Lake County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.6 points.
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.3/10. The poverty rate is 22%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.5/10.
SNAP participation runs 6.5% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 94 filings here across 9 tracked years.
Severe burden reaches 9%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Average gross rent is $1,274, 10% below the Salt Lake City average. The worst year on record was 2008, when 1.6% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 1.0% of renter households face a filing.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 49035100800
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49035100800?
What is the average rent in tract 49035100800?
What is the poverty rate in tract 49035100800?
How socially vulnerable is tract 49035100800?
Is tract 49035100800 considered part of Marmalade District?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49035100800?
What share of households in tract 49035100800 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 49035100800 compare to Salt Lake City overall?
Was tract 49035100800 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Salt Lake City
Top eight tracts in Salt Lake City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.