Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally
Leeds Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49053270101 · Washington, UT · pop 4,592 · 16% of tract blocks fall in Leeds
The Lower-tier score of 2.2/10 for census tract 49053270101 reflects conditions in Leeds, Utah. That places it near the bottom of the national scale, one of the easier tracts in the country for landlords.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 17% of renter households, a modest level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,236 a month while the average household earns $81,336 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 13% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,733
Renter share12.8%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$81,336
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
29
th percentile
Low
Within state
53
th percentile
Moderate
National
19
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Leeds and the region
Centroid at 37.3646, -113.3099 · click any tract to drill in
Why Leeds scores 2.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Leeds
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.4
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,236 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Leeds
1.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Leeds
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Leeds
2.2
How Leeds compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 32
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 37%Socioeconomic
- 45%Household composition
- 15%Racial/ethnic minority
- 34%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.0%Housing insecurity
- 5.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.7%Food insecurity
- 5.2%SNAP enrollment
- 5.6%Transit barriers
- 8.2%No health insurance
- 14.7%Frequent mental distress
- 34.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Leeds
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 4.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Leeds, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Washington County average of 3.4 and below the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 32nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 49053270101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49053270101?
Census tract 49053270101 in Leeds scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49053270101?
Median gross rent is $1,236/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 17% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49053270101?
7.1% of residents in tract 49053270101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,592.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49053270101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 45th, minority 15th, housing 34th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 49053270101 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 49053270101 compare to Leeds overall?
Tract 49053270101 scores 2.4/10, higher than the parent city of Leeds at 1.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Leeds; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related