Skip to content
North Clarendon, Vermont eviction risk overview
City brief · 297 residents

North Clarendon, VT Eviction Risk: MODERATE

Rutland County · Population 297

In 2026
Risk score
4.5
MODERATE

37th percentile, Vermont.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.1 Average3.3 Now4.5
5.9 2.1 1976 · score 2.3 1977 · score 2.2 1978 · score 2.2 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.3 1983 · score 2.2 1984 · score 2.2 1985 · score 2.2 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.5 1990 · score 2.6 1991 · score 2.7 1992 · score 2.7 1993 · score 2.7 1994 · score 2.7 1995 · score 2.7 1996 · score 3.0 1997 · score 3.0 1998 · score 3.0 1999 · score 3.0 2000 · score 2.9 2001 · score 2.9 2002 · score 2.9 2003 · score 2.9 2004 · score 3.2 2005 · score 3.2 2006 · score 3.3 2007 · score 3.3 2008 · score 4.1 2009 · score 4.3 2010 · score 4.3 2011 · score 4.3 2012 · score 4.3 2013 · score 4.3 2014 · score 4.3 2015 · score 4.3 2016 · score 4.3 2017 · score 4.3 2018 · score 4.2 2019 · score 4.2 2020 · score 5.7 2021 · score 5.9 2022 · score 4.9 2023 · score 4.6 2024 · score 4.6 2025 · score 4.5 2026 · score 4.5

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.0 Regional 6.0 State 4.6 Economic 2.6 Supply 6.0 Rent Control 7.1 Eviction 4.4 Tenant 8.9 Housing 5.6 4.5 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +5.3% (2024)
    6.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.0
  3. State political climate
    Vermont legislature & governorship
    4.6
  4. Economic stress
    7.3% poverty · 4.7% unemp.
    2.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $785 average · 33.7% renters
    6.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    31.7% of income on rent
    7.1
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    92 days filing → judgment
    4.4
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    33.7% renters
    8.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.6
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Clarendon and the region

Click any city to see its score

How North Clarendon compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Rutland County
Low
#16 of 20 cities
Rank in county, 21st percentileLowHigh
#16 of 20 cities in Rutland County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Vermont
Low
#126 of 180 cities
Rank in state, 30th percentileLowHigh
#126 of 180 cities in Vermont for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
North Clarendon risk score vs. county / state / U.S.North Clarendon: 4.54.5North ClarendonThis cityCounty: 5.05.0Countyavg in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 4.5
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 4.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+2.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 92d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $785/mo. A contested eviction takes 92 days and costs $3,986–$9,457 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 33.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 297 residents, 33.7% rent. 32% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 7.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6 and 6 (Dem margin +5.3% (2024)). State climate at 4.6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 4.6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 4.6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 4.4, housing court bias 5.6, rent-control risk 7.1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-0.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 2.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 2.6. Supply constraint: 6. The numbers behind those: 7.3% poverty, 4.7% unemployment, 32% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

North Clarendon sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Worcester, MA · 184d · ~$19.8k all-in ($108/day) · score 6.4 Worcester Providence, RI · 108d · ~$8.9k all-in ($83/day) · score 6 Providence Springfield, MA · 191d · ~$20.6k all-in ($108/day) · score 6.7 Springfield Hartford, CT · 133d · ~$11.1k all-in ($84/day) · score 7.6 Hartford Cambridge, MA · 212d · ~$19.8k all-in ($93/day) · score 7.1 Cambridge Lowell, MA · 198d · ~$19.9k all-in ($101/day) · score 6.1 Lowell Manchester, NH · 57d · ~$4.6k all-in ($81/day) · score 3.7 Manchester Waterbury, CT · 129d · ~$9.9k all-in ($76/day) · score 7.2 Waterbury Brockton, MA · 207d · ~$19.7k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.2 Brockton Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle North Clarendon
North Clarendon · 92d · ~$6.7k all-in ($73/day) · score 4.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in North Clarendon, VT

Landlording in North Clarendon, Vermont, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 4.5/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

North Clarendon is a city of 297 residents where 33.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 31.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $785/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How North Clarendon eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 4.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in North Clarendon closes 92 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of North Clarendon's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in North Clarendon runs $3,986 to $9,457 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 92 days of typical timeline and $785/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.9/10 in North Clarendon, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (7.1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Vermont, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in North Clarendon: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Vermont's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $9,457 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in North Clarendon

Trap · 7.1/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. North Clarendon's 5.3/10 is near the Vermont state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 7.1/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in North Clarendon without a reason?

Yes, you can, but it requires a 60-day notice for a no-cause termination. Vermont does not have a statewide just-cause eviction requirement, unlike some other states. However, you still need to follow the proper notice periods and court procedures.

Q2

What if my tenant pays part of the rent after I give them a 14-day notice?

Be very careful here. Accepting a partial payment after issuing a 14-day pay-or-quit notice can be seen as waiving your right to proceed with the eviction based on that notice. It's generally best practice to refuse partial payments once the formal eviction process has started unless you are intentionally creating a new agreement or want to restart the notice period.

Q3

How long does it really take to get a tenant out in North Clarendon?

The typical timeline is 92 days from start to finish. This is an average and can vary depending on court backlogs, how quickly you serve notices, and whether the tenant contests the eviction. Always plan for it to take at least three months, and possibly longer.

Q4

Is there a limit on how much I can charge for a security deposit in Vermont?

No, Vermont does not have a statutory cap on security deposits. However, you must return the deposit within 14 days of the tenant moving out, along with an itemized statement if any deductions are made. Keep it reasonable to attract good tenants.

Q5

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in North Clarendon?

While you can represent yourself in Vermont courts, it's highly recommended to at least consult with an attorney. The process has specific legal requirements, and mistakes can lead to delays or even dismissal of your case. Given the average costs and timeline, an attorney often saves you money in the long run.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 4.5/10 places North Clarendon in the 37th percentile of Vermont cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.