Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally

Ravensdale Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53033031501 · King County, WA · pop 3,987 · 0% of tract blocks fall in Ravensdale

Census tract 53033031501 covers part of Ravensdale, WA, and scores 3.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,987. Against the King County average of 6.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 3.0 points.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 10% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,436
Renter share15.5%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate4.1%
Median income$117,652

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Ravensdale
Moderate
Within county
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#470 of 494 tracts In King County
Very Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#1,541 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#54,273 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ravensdale and the region

Centroid at 47.3204, -121.8791 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ravensdale scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ravensdale
7.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
4.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,500 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ravensdale
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ravensdale
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ravensdale
3.7

How Ravensdale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ravensdale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 031501Ravensdale: 4.34.3Ravensdaleparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 29

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 34Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 1.75%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.1%Peak (2006)
  • 3Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530330315012004: 4 filings (2.15/100 renter HHs)2005: 3 filings (1.56/100 renter HHs)2006: 6 filings (3.12/100 renter HHs)2007: 1 filings (0.52/100 renter HHs)2008: 4 filings (2.08/100 renter HHs)2009: 4 filings (2.08/100 renter HHs)2010: 4 filings (1.94/100 renter HHs)2011: 5 filings (1.43/100 renter HHs)2012: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2013: 3 filings (0.86/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 25% over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ravensdale

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. 33% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the King County average of 44.1%.

Severe burden reaches 16%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.9/10. The filing record is not thin: 34 evictions over 9 years of observation.

The worst year on record was 2006, when 3.1% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.7% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 35% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 16% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 53033031501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53033031501?

Census tract 53033031501 in Ravensdale scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53033031501?

Median gross rent is $1,500/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53033031501?

4.1% of residents in tract 53033031501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,987.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53033031501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 32th, minority 22th, housing 46th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53033031501?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 34 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 53033031501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.75% of renter households, peaking at 3.1% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 53033031501 compare to Ravensdale overall?

Tract 53033031501 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Ravensdale at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ravensdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related