Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,747 of 84,120 nationally

The Verandas Eviction Risk: Elevated , Tacoma

Tract 53053062801 · Pierce County, WA · pop 8,142 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 53053062801 sits in the The Verandas neighborhood of Tacoma, Washington. It has a population of 8,142 and an eviction-risk score of 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). 53% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 24% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $1,543/month against a median household income of $59,873 — roughly 31% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 43% Stable renters 38% Owners 19%
Tract context
Occupied units3,105
Renter share80.8%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate19.6%
Median income$59,873

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank — 50th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 1 tracts In The Verandas
Moderate
Within parent city
84 th percentile
Rank — 84th percentileBottomTop
#9 of 50 tracts In Tacoma
High
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank — 94th percentileBottomTop
#12 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank — 98th percentileBottomTop
#42 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tacoma and the region

Centroid at 47.2221, -122.4974 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Verandas scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
19.6% poverty · this tract
4.9
Supply constraint
$1,543 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5

How The Verandas compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Verandas risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.46.4This tracttract 062801Tacoma: 7.47.4Tacomaparent cityCounty: 5.55.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.25.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 88

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C — Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org) — 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,122Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 4.46%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.4%Peak (2007)
  • 114Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 — 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530628012004: 115 filings (5.25/100 renter HHs)2005: 116 filings (4.79/100 renter HHs)2006: 95 filings (3.92/100 renter HHs)2007: 131 filings (5.40/100 renter HHs)2008: 100 filings (4.13/100 renter HHs)2009: 79 filings (3.26/100 renter HHs)2010: 95 filings (4.57/100 renter HHs)2012: 83 filings (3.76/100 renter HHs)2013: 79 filings (3.58/100 renter HHs)2014: 115 filings (5.21/100 renter HHs)2015: 114 filings (5.16/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 334Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 7.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.60×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 — 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 12 filings (1.44× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (1.07× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (0.34× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.26× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (0.34× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (0.48× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (0.34× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (0.41× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (0.82× baseline)2023-06-01: 14 filings (1.40× baseline)2023-07-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2023-08-01: 7 filings (0.88× baseline)2023-09-01: 10 filings (1.88× baseline)2023-10-01: 13 filings (1.69× baseline)2023-11-01: 14 filings (2.47× baseline)2023-12-01: 7 filings (1.62× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-02-01: 12 filings (2.57× baseline)2024-03-01: 10 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-07-01: 9 filings (1.29× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (1.13× baseline)2024-10-01: 12 filings (1.56× baseline)2024-11-01: 5 filings (0.88× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2025-01-01: 8 filings (0.96× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 15 filings (1.29× baseline)2025-04-01: 7 filings (0.95× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (0.82× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (0.70× baseline)2025-07-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (0.88× baseline)2025-12-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2026-01-01: 7 filings (0.84× baseline)2026-02-01: 7 filings (1.50× baseline)2026-03-01: 10 filings (0.86× baseline)2026-04-01: 6 filings (0.82× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053062801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053062801?

Census tract 53053062801 in the The Verandas neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053062801?

Median gross rent is $1,543/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053062801?

19.6% of residents in tract 53053062801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,142.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053062801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 72th, minority 65th, housing 98th.

Q5

Is tract 53053062801 considered part of The Verandas?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053062801 fall within The Verandas (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).

Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053062801?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,122 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053062801 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.46% of renter households, peaking at 5.4% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053062801 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.60× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply — likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.

Q8

How does tract 53053062801 compare to Tacoma overall?

Tract 53053062801 scores 6.4/10 — lower than the parent city of Tacoma at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Q9

Was tract 53053062801 historically redlined?

Yes — this tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma

Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related