Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally
Pasadera Neighborhod Eviction Risk: Lower , Bunk Foss
Tract 53061052607 · Snohomish County, WA · pop 6,776 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
For landlords sizing up the Pasadera Neighborhod area of Bunk Foss, census tract 53061052607 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.6/10. That is riskier than roughly 24% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 38% of renter households, a high level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,837 monthly, set against $146,797 in average yearly household income, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 11% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,995
Renter share11.5%
SVI overall0.12
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$146,797
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
12
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
6
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bunk Foss and the region
Centroid at 47.9688, -122.0745 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pasadera Neighborhod scores 1.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Bunk Foss
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$2,837 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bunk Foss
2.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bunk Foss
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bunk Foss
2.9
How Pasadera Neighborhod compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 12
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 13%Socioeconomic
- 37%Household composition
- 39%Racial/ethnic minority
- 11%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 17Total filings over 5 yrs
- 1.45%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.9%Peak (2015)
- 2Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Pasadera Neighborhod. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Pasadera Neighborhod
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 5.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Bunk Foss, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Snohomish County average of 5.2 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 17 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 1.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.9% of renter households in 2015.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 12th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 53061052607
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061052607?
Census tract 53061052607 in the Pasadera Neighborhod neighborhood scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53061052607?
Median gross rent is $2,837/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53061052607?
8.6% of residents in tract 53061052607 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,776.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53061052607?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 12th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 37th, minority 39th, housing 11th.
Q5
Is tract 53061052607 considered part of Pasadera Neighborhod?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53061052607 fall within Pasadera Neighborhod (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53061052607?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 17 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 53061052607 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.45% of renter households, peaking at 2.9% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
How does tract 53061052607 compare to Bunk Foss overall?
Tract 53061052607 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Bunk Foss at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bunk Foss; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Bunk Foss
Top eight tracts in Bunk Foss ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related