Census Tract · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally
Eastmont Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 53061041609 ·
Snohomish County, WA · pop 3,870 · 97% of tract blocks fall in Eastmont
53061041609 is a census tract in Eastmont, WA. It scores 4.1/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,870. Cost burden runs 30% here against 47.3% across Snohomish County.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 4%Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,524
Renter share5.1%
SVI overall0.25
Poverty rate8.1%
Median income$128,622
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
60th percentile
#3 of 6 tracts In Eastmont
Elevated
Within county
23th percentile
#133 of 173 tracts In Snohomish County
Low
Within state
18th percentile
#1,456 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
44th percentile
#47,371 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Eastmont and the region
Centroid at 47.8843, -122.1768 · click any tract to drill in
Why Eastmont scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Eastmont
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
8.1% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,734 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Eastmont
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Eastmont
3.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Eastmont
6.2
How Eastmont compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 25
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 8.6/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.5/10.
At $1,734 a month, rents run 29% under what the rest of Eastmont commands. Running cool, economic stress reads 2/10.
14% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. It sits 1.3 points below the Snohomish County average of 5.4.
On the national scale it lands near the 44th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 5% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Against average income of $128,622, annual rent is just 16%. Statewide the WA average is 5.9, so this tract runs 1.8 points cooler.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 53061041609
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061041609?
Census tract 53061041609 in Eastmont scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53061041609?
Median gross rent is $1,734/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53061041609?
8.1% of residents in tract 53061041609 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,870.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53061041609?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 25th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 31th, minority 60th, housing 30th.
Q5
How does tract 53061041609 compare to Eastmont overall?
Tract 53061041609 scores 4.1/10, lower than the parent city of Eastmont at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Eastmont eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Eastmont
Top eight tracts in Eastmont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.