Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Sun Rose Eviction Risk: Lower , Eastmont

Tract 53061041606 · Snohomish County, WA · pop 7,476 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 53061041606 sits in the Sun Rose area of Eastmont eviction risk, Washington eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.4/10. It lands near the 51st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 66% of renter households, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,091 monthly, set against $102,677 in average yearly household income, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 48% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 16% Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units2,305
Renter share48.0%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate7.3%
Median income$102,677

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Sun Rose
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Eastmont
Very High
Within county
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#96 of 173 tracts In Snohomish County
Moderate
Within state
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#1,474 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Eastmont and the region

Centroid at 47.8857, -122.1970 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sun Rose scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Eastmont
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
7.3% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$2,091 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Eastmont
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Eastmont
3.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Eastmont
6.2

How Sun Rose compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sun Rose risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 041606Eastmont: 7.07.0Eastmontparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 81

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 180Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 4.54%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.6%Peak (2015)
  • 36Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2008 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530610416062008: 34 filings (4.79/100 renter HHs)2014: 35 filings (4.39/100 renter HHs)2015: 45 filings (5.64/100 renter HHs)2016: 30 filings (3.58/100 renter HHs)2017: 36 filings (4.30/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.
Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sun Rose

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Eastmont eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Snohomish County average of 5.2 and in line with the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 81st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 180 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 4.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.6% of renter households in 2015.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53061041606

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061041606?

Census tract 53061041606 in the Sun Rose neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53061041606?

Median gross rent is $2,091/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 66% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53061041606?

7.3% of residents in tract 53061041606 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,476.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53061041606?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 93th, minority 58th, housing 85th.
Q5

Is tract 53061041606 considered part of Sun Rose?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53061041606 fall within Sun Rose (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53061041606?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 180 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 53061041606 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.54% of renter households, peaking at 5.6% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 53061041606 compare to Eastmont overall?

Tract 53061041606 scores 2.7/10, lower than the parent city of Eastmont at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Eastmont eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Eastmont

Top eight tracts in Eastmont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related