Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #72,539 of 84,120 nationally

Silver Firs Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53061052122 · Snohomish County, WA · pop 3,842 · 58% of tract blocks fall in Silver Firs

Census tract 53061052122 sits in Silver Firs in Snohomish County, Washington eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 4.3/10. That is riskier than roughly 17% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 12% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $171,900 a year. Renters make up 14% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.1
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 12% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,260
Renter share13.8%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate7.9%
Median income$171,900

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 tracts In Silver Firs
High
Within county
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#129 of 173 tracts In Snohomish County
Low
Within state
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#1,593 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#72,539 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Silver Firs and the region

Centroid at 47.8618, -122.1275 · click any tract to drill in

Why Silver Firs scores 2.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Silver Firs
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
7.9% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Silver Firs
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Silver Firs
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Silver Firs
6.1

How Silver Firs compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Silver Firs risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.12.1This tracttract 052122Silver Firs: 6.66.6Silver Firsparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Silver Firs

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Silver Firs, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Snohomish County average of 5.2 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 9th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53061052122

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061052122?

Census tract 53061052122 in Silver Firs scores 2.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 53061052122?

7.9% of residents in tract 53061052122 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,842.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 53061052122?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 14th, minority 37th, housing 13th.
Q4

How does tract 53061052122 compare to Silver Firs overall?

Tract 53061052122 scores 2.1/10, lower than the parent city of Silver Firs at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Silver Firs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Silver Firs

Top eight tracts in Silver Firs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related