Census Tract · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Glacier Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 53073010103 ·
Whatcom County, WA · pop 2,489 · 5% of tract blocks fall in Glacier
53073010103 is a census tract in Glacier, WA. It scores 3.8/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,489. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1/10.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%Stable renters 9%Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units904
Renter share13.6%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate11.7%
Median income$88,430
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Glacier
Moderate
Within county
11th percentile
#48 of 54 tracts In Whatcom County
Very Low
Within state
15th percentile
#1,516 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
38th percentile
#52,479 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Glacier and the region
Centroid at 48.8211, -121.3126 · click any tract to drill in
Why Glacier scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Glacier
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
11.7% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$975 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glacier
4.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glacier
5.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glacier
4.4
How Glacier compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 51
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
37% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Whatcom County average of 49.6%. It sits 2.1 points below the Whatcom County average of 5.9.
On the softer side, court filing pressure reads 1.1/10. Severe burden reaches 11%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2.9/10.
That is riskier than roughly 38% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $88,430, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the WA average is 5.9, so this tract runs 2.1 points cooler.
Average gross rent is $975, close to the Glacier average.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 53073010103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53073010103?
Census tract 53073010103 in Glacier scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53073010103?
Median gross rent is $975/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53073010103?
11.7% of residents in tract 53073010103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,489.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53073010103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 41th, minority 40th, housing 69th.
Q5
How does tract 53073010103 compare to Glacier overall?
Tract 53073010103 scores 3.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Glacier at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glacier; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.