Census Tract · Ranked #16,850 of 84,120 nationally
Glacier Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 53073010103 ·
Whatcom County, WA · pop 2,489 · 5% of tract blocks fall in Glacier
For landlords sizing up Glacier, census tract 53073010103 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.4/10. That is riskier than about 19% of US census tracts.
About 37% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $975 a month while the average household earns $88,430 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. Renters make up 14% of occupied homes.
Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%Stable renters 9%Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units904
Renter share13.6%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate11.7%
Median income$88,430
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Glacier
Moderate
Within county
59th percentile
#23 of 54 tracts In Whatcom County
Elevated
Within state
75th percentile
#446 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Elevated
National
80th percentile
#16,850 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Glacier and the region
Centroid at 48.8211, -121.3126 · click any tract to drill in
Why Glacier scores 5.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Glacier
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
11.7% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$975 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glacier
4.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glacier
5.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glacier
4.4
How Glacier compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 51
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Glacier, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Whatcom County average of 5.2 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 51st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 53073010103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53073010103?
Census tract 53073010103 in Glacier scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53073010103?
Median gross rent is $975/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53073010103?
11.7% of residents in tract 53073010103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,489.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53073010103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 41th, minority 40th, housing 69th.
Q5
How does tract 53073010103 compare to Glacier overall?
Tract 53073010103 scores 5.6/10, lower than the parent city of Glacier at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glacier; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.