Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

South Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Charleston

Tract 54039002000 · Kanawha County, WV · pop 2,849 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 54039002000 sits in the South Hills area of Charleston eviction risk, WV, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 13% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,371
Renter share20.4%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate6.2%
Median income$77,554

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In South Hills
Very Low
Within parent city
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 20 tracts In Charleston
Very Low
Within county
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#52 of 57 tracts In Kanawha County
Very Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#391 of 546 tracts In West Virginia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Charleston and the region

Centroid at 38.3423, -81.6465 · click any tract to drill in

Why South Hills scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Charleston
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
West Virginia legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
6.2% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$997 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Charleston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Charleston
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Charleston
2.5

How South Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
South Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0020003.2Charlestonparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 21

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within South Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in South Hills

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.6/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

The severe-burden share is 16%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. SNAP participation runs 6.4% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 0.9 points below the Kanawha County average of 3.9.

Adults with no health insurance runs 4.2% against 11.3% nationally. At $997 a month, rents run 10% over what the rest of Charleston commands. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 20% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Against average income of $77,554, annual rent is just 15%. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 54039002000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 54039002000?

Census tract 54039002000 in the South Hills neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 54039002000?

Median gross rent is $997/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 54039002000?

6.2% of residents in tract 54039002000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,849.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 54039002000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 61th, minority 24th, housing 7th.
Q5

Is tract 54039002000 considered part of South Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 54039002000 fall within South Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 54039002000 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 54039002000 compare to Charleston overall?

Tract 54039002000 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Charleston at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Charleston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 54039002000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 13% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Charleston

Top eight tracts in Charleston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related