Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #29,578 of 84,120 nationally

Charleston Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 54039000200 · Kanawha County, WV · pop 2,076 · 62% of tract blocks fall in Charleston

Census tract 54039000200 belongs to Charleston, West Virginia. It is home to 2,076 residents and scores 4.4/10, a moderate reading for landlords. That is riskier than about 19% of US census tracts.

About 64% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $928 a month while the average household earns $48,077 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 26% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 9% Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units848
Renter share25.9%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate18.5%
Median income$48,077

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 20 tracts In Charleston
Elevated
Within county
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 57 tracts In Kanawha County
Elevated
Within state
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#188 of 546 tracts In West Virginia
Elevated
National
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#29,578 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Charleston and the region

Centroid at 38.3918, -81.6822 · click any tract to drill in

Why Charleston scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Charleston
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
West Virginia legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
18.5% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
$928 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Charleston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Charleston
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Charleston
2.5

How Charleston compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Charleston risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.74.7This tracttract 000200Charleston: 3.03.0Charlestonparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 62

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Charleston

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 4.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Charleston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Kanawha County average of 4.3 and in line with the West Virginia statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

In CDC survey modeling, about 18.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 17.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 54039000200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 54039000200?

Census tract 54039000200 in Charleston scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 54039000200?

Median gross rent is $928/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 54039000200?

18.5% of residents in tract 54039000200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,076.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 54039000200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 52th, household 77th, minority 44th, housing 60th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 54039000200 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 54039000200 compare to Charleston overall?

Tract 54039000200 scores 4.7/10, higher than the parent city of Charleston at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Charleston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 54039000200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Charleston

Top eight tracts in Charleston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related