Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

McFarland Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 55025010503 · Dane County, WI · pop 5,046 · 83% of tract blocks fall in McFarland

Census tract 55025010503 covers part of McFarland, WI, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Against Dane County at 41.3%, 65% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 4% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,954
Renter share10.5%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate2.8%
Median income$124,950

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In McFarland
Very Low
Within county
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#112 of 125 tracts In Dane County
Very Low
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#1,083 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across McFarland and the region

Centroid at 42.9971, -89.2755 · click any tract to drill in

Why McFarland scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from McFarland
7.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.6
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
2.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,696 rent vs county FMR
6.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from McFarland
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from McFarland
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from McFarland
4.0

How McFarland compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
McFarland risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0105034.0McFarlandparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 7

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in McFarland

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.9/10.

Against the Dane County average of 4.2, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points. Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 7.6/10. 10% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Average gross rent is $1,696, 16% above the McFarland average. The voucher gap is 15.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Housing insecurity runs 6.7% against 14.2% nationally.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $124,950, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 55025010503

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55025010503?

Census tract 55025010503 in McFarland scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 55025010503?

Median gross rent is $1,696/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 55025010503?

2.8% of residents in tract 55025010503 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,046.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 55025010503?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 45th, minority 17th, housing 7th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 55025010503 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 55025010503 compare to McFarland overall?

Tract 55025010503 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of McFarland at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from McFarland; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in McFarland

Top eight tracts in McFarland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related