McFarland Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 55025010503 · Dane County, WI · pop 5,046 · 83% of tract blocks fall in McFarland
Census tract 55025010503 covers part of McFarland, WI, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Against Dane County at 41.3%, 65% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across McFarland and the region
Centroid at 42.9971, -89.2755 · click any tract to drill in
Why McFarland scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow McFarland compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 6%Socioeconomic
- 45%Household composition
- 17%Racial/ethnic minority
- 7%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.7%Housing insecurity
- 3.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.1%Food insecurity
- 7.0%SNAP enrollment
- 4.5%Transit barriers
- 5.1%No health insurance
- 13.9%Frequent mental distress
- 23.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in McFarland
The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.9/10.
Against the Dane County average of 4.2, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points. Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 7.6/10. 10% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Average gross rent is $1,696, 16% above the McFarland average. The voucher gap is 15.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Housing insecurity runs 6.7% against 14.2% nationally.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $124,950, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 55025010503
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55025010503?
What is the average rent in tract 55025010503?
What is the poverty rate in tract 55025010503?
How socially vulnerable is tract 55025010503?
What share of households in tract 55025010503 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 55025010503 compare to McFarland overall?
Highest-risk tracts in McFarland
Top eight tracts in McFarland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.