Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally

Tripoli Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Brown Deer

Tract 55079000900 · Milwaukee County, WI · pop 4,510 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

With a score of 5.8/10, tract 55079000900 in the Tripoli Park area of Milwaukee, WI reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Against Milwaukee County at 45.8%, 63% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 41% Stable renters 24% Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units1,570
Renter share64.5%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate28.6%
Median income$41,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Tripoli Park
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 210 tracts In Brown Deer
Very High
Within county
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#69 of 301 tracts In Milwaukee County
High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#29 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Brown Deer and the region

Centroid at 43.1518, -87.9570 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tripoli Park scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Brown Deer
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.0
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
28.6% poverty · this tract
7.2
Supply constraint
$880 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brown Deer
2.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brown Deer
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brown Deer
5.5

How Tripoli Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tripoli Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.85.8This tracttract 000900Brown Deer: 4.14.1Brown Deerparent cityCounty: 4.54.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 87

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,275Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 12.11%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.4%Peak (2010)
  • 119Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 550790009002003: 57 filings (7.16/100 renter HHs)2004: 69 filings (8.67/100 renter HHs)2007: 93 filings (12.40/100 renter HHs)2008: 93 filings (12.40/100 renter HHs)2009: 105 filings (14.00/100 renter HHs)2010: 128 filings (15.35/100 renter HHs)2011: 91 filings (10.81/100 renter HHs)2012: 105 filings (12.47/100 renter HHs)2013: 110 filings (13.06/100 renter HHs)2014: 111 filings (13.18/100 renter HHs)2015: 104 filings (12.35/100 renter HHs)2016: 90 filings (11.00/100 renter HHs)2017: 119 filings (14.55/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 109% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 542Total filings 2020-21
  • 7.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 8.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.86×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (0.65× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-07-01: 7 filings (0.66× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-12-01: 6 filings (1.03× baseline)2021-01-01: 4 filings (0.37× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (0.59× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (0.37× baseline)2021-12-01: 11 filings (1.90× baseline)2022-01-01: 20 filings (1.85× baseline)2022-02-01: 20 filings (4.35× baseline)2022-03-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2022-04-01: 11 filings (1.22× baseline)2022-05-01: 11 filings (1.22× baseline)2022-06-01: 8 filings (0.82× baseline)2022-07-01: 7 filings (0.66× baseline)2022-08-01: 16 filings (1.54× baseline)2022-09-01: 11 filings (1.04× baseline)2022-10-01: 7 filings (0.69× baseline)2022-11-01: 9 filings (1.10× baseline)2022-12-01: 7 filings (1.21× baseline)2023-01-01: 19 filings (1.76× baseline)2023-02-01: 10 filings (2.17× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2023-04-01: 10 filings (1.11× baseline)2023-05-01: 9 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 7 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-07-01: 13 filings (1.23× baseline)2023-08-01: 14 filings (1.35× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2023-10-01: 13 filings (1.27× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (0.85× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-01-01: 8 filings (0.74× baseline)2024-02-01: 11 filings (2.39× baseline)2024-03-01: 8 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-04-01: 11 filings (1.22× baseline)2024-05-01: 8 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-06-01: 16 filings (1.63× baseline)2024-07-01: 14 filings (1.32× baseline)2024-08-01: 11 filings (1.06× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (0.28× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.34× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 7 filings (0.78× baseline)2025-06-01: 17 filings (1.73× baseline)2025-07-01: 10 filings (0.94× baseline)2025-08-01: 12 filings (1.15× baseline)2025-09-01: 14 filings (1.32× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (0.39× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (0.61× baseline)2025-12-01: 9 filings (1.55× baseline)2026-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Milwaukee, WI as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Tripoli Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tripoli Park

The severe-burden share is 31%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Food insecurity runs 36.2% against 17.8% nationally. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 8.1/10.

The poverty rate is 29%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2/10. Against the Milwaukee County average of 4.5, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points.

Running hot, local political climate reads 7.5/10. Average gross rent is $880, 17% below the Milwaukee average. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 17.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

Court records carry 1,275 eviction filings across 13 observed years. The worst year on record was 2010, when 15.4% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 12.1% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 76th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 55079000900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55079000900?

Census tract 55079000900 in the Tripoli Park neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 55079000900?

Median gross rent is $880/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 55079000900?

28.6% of residents in tract 55079000900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,510.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 55079000900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 86th, minority 90th, housing 75th.
Q5

Is tract 55079000900 considered part of Tripoli Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55079000900 fall within Tripoli Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55079000900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,275 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 55079000900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.11% of renter households, peaking at 15.4% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 55079000900 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.86× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Milwaukee eviction risk, WI), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 55079000900 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 55079000900 compare to Brown Deer overall?

Tract 55079000900 scores 5.8/10, higher than the parent city of Brown Deer at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brown Deer; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Brown Deer

Top eight tracts in Brown Deer ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related