Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally

Elm Lane Eviction Risk: Lower , Brookfield

Tract 55133200700 · Waukesha County, WI · pop 4,340 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

In the Elm Lane area of Brookfield, census tract 55133200700 scores 3.9/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 10% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 40% of renter households, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,713 monthly, set against $127,696 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 3% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 2% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units1,636
Renter share3.4%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate3.4%
Median income$127,696

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Elm Lane
Very High
Within parent city
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 11 tracts In Brookfield
Low
Within county
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#80 of 98 tracts In Waukesha County
Very Low
Within state
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#1,491 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Brookfield and the region

Centroid at 43.0990, -88.1003 · click any tract to drill in

Why Elm Lane scores 1.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Brookfield
4.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.0
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
3.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,713 rent vs county FMR
8.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brookfield
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brookfield
4.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brookfield
3.2

How Elm Lane compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Elm Lane risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.21.2This tracttract 200700Brookfield: 2.72.7Brookfieldparent cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.43.4Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 4

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 13Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 2.12%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.7%Peak (2009)
  • 2Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 551332007002002: 1 filings (0.83/100 renter HHs)2009: 7 filings (3.70/100 renter HHs)2010: 3 filings (2.68/100 renter HHs)2013: 2 filings (1.28/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 100% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Elm Lane. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Elm Lane

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 8.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Brookfield eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Waukesha County average of 3.8 and below the Wisconsin statewide average of 4.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 13 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 2.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.7% of renter households in 2009.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 4th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 55133200700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55133200700?

Census tract 55133200700 in the Elm Lane neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 55133200700?

Median gross rent is $1,713/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 55133200700?

3.4% of residents in tract 55133200700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,340.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 55133200700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 13th, minority 33th, housing 7th.
Q5

Is tract 55133200700 considered part of Elm Lane?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55133200700 fall within Elm Lane (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55133200700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 13 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 55133200700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.12% of renter households, peaking at 3.7% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 55133200700 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 55133200700 compare to Brookfield overall?

Tract 55133200700 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Brookfield at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brookfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Brookfield

Top eight tracts in Brookfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related