Skip to content
Fort Rucker, Alabama eviction risk overview
City brief · 4,705 residents

Fort Rucker, AL Eviction Risk: LOW

Dale County · Population 4,705

In 2026
Risk score
2.5
LOW

81th percentile, Alabama.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.0 Average2.6 Now2.5
3.5 2.0 1976 · score 3.4 1977 · score 3.4 1978 · score 3.4 1979 · score 3.4 1980 · score 3.5 1981 · score 3.5 1982 · score 3.4 1983 · score 3.3 1984 · score 3.2 1985 · score 3.1 1986 · score 3.1 1987 · score 2.9 1988 · score 2.8 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.7 1991 · score 2.6 1992 · score 2.8 1993 · score 2.8 1994 · score 2.8 1995 · score 2.5 1996 · score 2.4 1997 · score 2.5 1998 · score 2.4 1999 · score 2.5 2000 · score 2.4 2001 · score 2.4 2002 · score 2.4 2003 · score 2.3 2004 · score 2.2 2005 · score 2.1 2006 · score 2.0 2007 · score 2.0 2008 · score 2.2 2009 · score 2.4 2010 · score 2.4 2011 · score 2.5 2012 · score 2.4 2013 · score 2.3 2014 · score 2.3 2015 · score 2.3 2016 · score 2.2 2017 · score 2.1 2018 · score 2.1 2019 · score 2.1 2020 · score 2.9 2021 · score 3.1 2022 · score 2.2 2023 · score 2.2 2024 · score 2.6 2025 · score 2.5 2026 · score 2.5

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.4 Regional 3.4 State 1.8 Economic 7.6 Supply 9.0 Rent Control 2.6 Eviction 2.0 Tenant 9.9 Housing 4.5 2.5 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +52.3% (2024)
    3.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.4
  3. State political climate
    Alabama legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    13.3% poverty · 10.8% unemp.
    7.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,441 average · 100.0% renters
    9.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    20.6% of income on rent
    2.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    29 days filing → judgment
    2.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    100.0% renters
    9.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fort Rucker and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Fort Rucker compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Dale County
High
#3 of 10 cities
Rank in county, 78th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 10 cities in Dale County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Alabama
High
#131 of 593 cities
Rank in state, 78th percentileLowHigh
#131 of 593 cities in Alabama for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Fort Rucker risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Fort Rucker: 2.52.5Fort RuckerThis cityCounty: 2.52.5Countyavg in countyState: 2.42.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.5
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.9 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 29d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,441/mo. A contested eviction takes 29 days and costs $1,015–$3,180 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 100.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 4,705 residents, 100.0% rent. 21% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 13.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.4 and 3.4 (GOP margin +52.3% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2, housing court bias 4.5, rent-control risk 2.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7.6. Supply constraint: 9. The numbers behind those: 13.3% poverty, 10.8% unemployment, 21% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Fort Rucker sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Dothan, AL · 31d · ~$1.9k all-in ($61/day) · score 2.5 Dothan Huntsville, AL · 29d · ~$2.0k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.3 Huntsville Mobile, AL · 30d · ~$1.9k all-in ($63/day) · score 2.8 Mobile Birmingham, AL · 32d · ~$1.7k all-in ($52/day) · score 2.9 Birmingham Montgomery, AL · 28d · ~$2.0k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.8 Montgomery Tuscaloosa, AL · 28d · ~$1.9k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.8 Tuscaloosa Hoover, AL · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.2 Hoover Auburn, AL · 32d · ~$2.1k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.5 Auburn Madison, AL · 30d · ~$2.1k all-in ($69/day) · score 2 Madison Decatur, AL · 31d · ~$1.8k all-in ($59/day) · score 2.5 Decatur Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Fort Rucker
Fort Rucker · 29d · ~$2.1k all-in ($72/day) · score 2.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Fort Rucker, AL

Landlording in Fort Rucker, Alabama, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.5/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Fort Rucker is a city of 4,705 residents where 100.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 20.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,441/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Fort Rucker eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Fort Rucker closes 29 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Fort Rucker's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Fort Rucker runs $1,015 to $3,180 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 29 days of typical timeline and $1,441/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9.9/10 in Fort Rucker, and the city has limited rent control exposure (2.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Alabama, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Fort Rucker: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Alabama's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,180 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Fort Rucker

Trap · 4.5/10
For landlords, the 4.1/10 score is most actionable when combined with Dale County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 4.5/10. Standard documentation and prompt action typically resolve cases quickly.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Fort Rucker without going to court?

No. You absolutely cannot. Self-help evictions, like changing locks, shutting off utilities, or removing a tenant's belongings, are illegal in Alabama and can lead to severe penalties, including financial damages owed to the tenant. You must follow the legal eviction process through the court system to regain possession of your property.

Q2

How long does a tenant have to move out after a Fort Rucker eviction judgment?

After a judge issues a Writ of Possession, the sheriff typically serves it, giving the tenant a short period, often 24-48 hours, to vacate before they physically remove the tenant and their belongings. This exact timeframe can vary slightly based on the local sheriff's department in Dale County.

Q3

What if my Fort Rucker tenant leaves belongings behind after an eviction?

In Alabama, you generally need to store the tenant's property for a reasonable period (often 14-30 days, though not explicitly defined by statute for all situations) and notify them of its location. If they don't claim it, you can then dispose of or sell it, deducting reasonable storage and sale costs. Check with a local attorney for the precise requirements in your situation to avoid legal issues.

Q4

Can I charge late fees in Fort Rucker?

Yes, you can charge late fees in Alabama, but they must be reasonable and clearly stated in your lease agreement. There's no specific statutory cap, but courts will generally not enforce excessive fees. A common practice is a flat fee or a percentage (e.g., 5%) of the monthly rent if not paid by a certain grace period (e.g., 5 days after the due date).

Q5

Is there rent control in Fort Rucker, AL?

No, Alabama has a statewide preemption against rent control. This means no city or county in Alabama, including Fort Rucker, can enact rent control laws. You are free to set market rates and increase rent according to your lease terms and proper notice requirements.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.5/10 places Fort Rucker in the 81st percentile of Alabama cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.