Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

Marks Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Birmingham

Tract 01073001902 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 1,676 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

With a score of 5.4/10, tract 01073001902 in the Marks Village area of Birmingham, AL reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,676. 36% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46% Stable renters 29% Owners 25%
Tract context
Occupied units670
Renter share74.3%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate30.8%
Median income$29,917

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Marks Village
Very High
Within parent city
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#39 of 71 tracts In Birmingham
Moderate
Within county
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#44 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
High
Within state
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#73 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Birmingham and the region

Centroid at 33.5532, -86.7431 · click any tract to drill in

Why Marks Village scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Birmingham
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
30.8% poverty · this tract
7.7
Supply constraint
$934 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Birmingham
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Birmingham
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Birmingham
3.0

How Marks Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Marks Village risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.4This tracttract 0019024.0Birminghamparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 285Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 5.18%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.9%Peak (2001)
  • 24Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 01073001902
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Marks Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Marks Village

Cost burden runs 61% here against 46.3% across Jefferson County. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Set annual rent against average income of $29,917 and the ratio lands at 37%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

74% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The poverty rate is 31%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

Disability prevalence runs 44.5% against 31.5% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 20.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Sitting well above the midpoint, economic stress reads 7.7/10.

Against the Jefferson County average of 4.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points. At $934 a month, rents run 16% under what the rest of Birmingham commands. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 285 filings here across 11 tracked years.

The worst year on record was 2001, when 8.9% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073001902

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073001902?

Census tract 01073001902 in the Marks Village neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073001902?

Median gross rent is $934/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073001902?

30.8% of residents in tract 01073001902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,676.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073001902?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 82th, minority 94th, housing 60th.
Q5

Is tract 01073001902 considered part of Marks Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073001902 fall within Marks Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073001902?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 285 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073001902 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.18% of renter households, peaking at 8.9% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01073001902 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 20.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01073001902 compare to Birmingham overall?

Tract 01073001902 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Birmingham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 01073001902 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 68% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham

Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related