Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

Birmingham Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 01073005907 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 2,959 · 86% of tract blocks fall in Birmingham

01073005907 is a census tract in Birmingham, AL. It scores 5.4/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,959. The severe-burden share is 79%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 3% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units879
Renter share24.1%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate41.6%
Median income$56,771

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#14 of 71 tracts In Birmingham
High
Within county
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#31 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
High
Within state
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#73 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very High
National
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#24,859 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Birmingham and the region

Centroid at 33.6146, -86.6690 · click any tract to drill in

Why Birmingham scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Birmingham
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
41.6% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$1,652 rent vs county FMR
8.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Birmingham
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Birmingham
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Birmingham
3.0

How Birmingham compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Birmingham risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.4This tracttract 0059074.0Birminghamparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 34

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 43Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 8.03%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.4%Peak (2016)
  • 7Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 01073005907
Filings climbed 250% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Birmingham

86% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Jefferson County average of 46.3%. The dominant input is economic stress at 10/10.

Average gross rent is $1,652, 49% above the Birmingham average. The poverty rate is 42%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. The voucher gap is 30.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Set annual rent against average income of $56,771 and the ratio lands at 35%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10. Housing insecurity runs 25.6% against 14.2% nationally.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 20.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. It sits 1.1 points above the Jefferson County average of 4.3. The filing record is not thin: 43 evictions over 10 years of observation.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073005907

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073005907?

Census tract 01073005907 in Birmingham scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073005907?

Median gross rent is $1,652/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 86% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073005907?

41.6% of residents in tract 01073005907 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,959.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073005907?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 31th, minority 89th, housing 3th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073005907?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 43 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01073005907 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.03% of renter households, peaking at 5.4% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 01073005907 struggle to pay rent?

About 25.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 20.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 01073005907 compare to Birmingham overall?

Tract 01073005907 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Birmingham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham

Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related