Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally
Ensley Eviction Risk: Moderate , Birmingham
Tract 01073003100 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 3,688 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 01073003100 covers part of the Ensley area of Birmingham, AL, and scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,688. SNAP participation runs 42.4% against 15.2% nationally.
Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22%
Stable renters 21%
Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,381
Renter share42.8%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate25.9%
Median income$36,875
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
89
th percentile
High
Within county
71
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
95
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Birmingham and the region
Centroid at 33.5059, -86.8746 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ensley scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Birmingham
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
25.9% poverty · this tract
6.5
Supply constraint
$950 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Birmingham
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Birmingham
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Birmingham
3.0
How Ensley compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 93
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 98%Socioeconomic
- 67%Household composition
- 89%Racial/ethnic minority
- 78%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 20%Grade B
- 62%Grade C
- 17%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 505Total filings over 11 yrs
- 5.89%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.2%Peak (2001)
- 50Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 22% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Ensley. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 30.9%Housing insecurity
- 25.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 44.8%Food insecurity
- 42.4%SNAP enrollment
- 21.5%Transit barriers
- 14.5%No health insurance
- 19.5%Frequent mental distress
- 48.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Ensley
The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. The severe-burden share is 25%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Disability prevalence runs 48.3% against 31.5% nationally.
Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10. The poverty rate is 26%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
It sits 1.1 points above the Jefferson County average of 4.3. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.5/10. The filing record is not thin: 505 evictions over 11 years of observation.
Average gross rent is $950, 14% below the Birmingham average. The worst year on record was 2001, when 9.2% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 01073003100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073003100?
Census tract 01073003100 in the Ensley neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01073003100?
Median gross rent is $950/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073003100?
25.9% of residents in tract 01073003100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,688.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073003100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 67th, minority 89th, housing 78th.
Q5
Is tract 01073003100 considered part of Ensley?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073003100 fall within Ensley (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073003100?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 505 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073003100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.89% of renter households, peaking at 9.2% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 01073003100 struggle to pay rent?
About 30.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 25.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 01073003100 compare to Birmingham overall?
Tract 01073003100 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Birmingham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 01073003100 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 17% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham
Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · AL
Smithfield Historic District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Woodlawn
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
01073013901
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Avondale
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
North Birmingham
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
01073014304
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Automotive Historic District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
North Birmingham
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Related