Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally

Leeds Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 01073011004 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 3,406 · 89% of tract blocks fall in Leeds

Census tract 01073011004 belongs to Leeds in Jefferson County, Alabama. It is home to 3,406 residents and scores $1/10, a moderate reading for landlords. That is riskier than about 13% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 22% of renter households, a moderate level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $938 monthly, set against $82,202 in average yearly household income, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 17% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,203
Renter share22.2%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate3.5%
Median income$82,202

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Leeds
Low
Within county
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#162 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Very Low
Within state
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#1,314 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very Low
National
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#71,178 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Leeds and the region

Centroid at 33.5301, -86.5533 · click any tract to drill in

Why Leeds scores 2.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Leeds
3.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
3.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$938 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Leeds
2.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Leeds
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Leeds
4.2

How Leeds compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Leeds risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.22.2This tracttract 011004Leeds: 1.91.9Leedsparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Leeds

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Leeds, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Jefferson County average of 5.3 and below the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073011004

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073011004?

Census tract 01073011004 in Leeds scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073011004?

Median gross rent is $938/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 22% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073011004?

3.5% of residents in tract 01073011004 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,406.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073011004?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 43th, household 29th, minority 26th, housing 14th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 01073011004 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 01073011004 compare to Leeds overall?

Tract 01073011004 scores 2.2/10, higher than the parent city of Leeds at 1.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Leeds; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Leeds

Top eight tracts in Leeds ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related