Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Roebuck Eviction Risk: Lower , Birmingham

Tract 01073005302 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 3,599 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Tract 01073005302 sits in the Roebuck area of Birmingham eviction risk, AL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. 9% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Jefferson County average of 46.3%.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 14% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,505
Renter share15.0%
SVI overall0.19
Poverty rate4.1%
Median income$75,057

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Roebuck
Moderate
Within parent city
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#69 of 71 tracts In Birmingham
Very Low
Within county
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#126 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#968 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Birmingham and the region

Centroid at 33.5767, -86.6965 · click any tract to drill in

Why Roebuck scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Birmingham
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
4.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,301 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Birmingham
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Birmingham
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Birmingham
3.0

How Roebuck compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Roebuck risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0053024.0Birminghamparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 19

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 85Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 4.70%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.3%Peak (2015)
  • 10Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 01073005302
Filings climbed 400% over the past 11 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Roebuck

The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

Against the Jefferson County average of 4.3, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.3 points. At $1,301 a month, rents run 18% over what the rest of Birmingham commands. Court records carry 85 eviction filings across 11 observed years.

Filings peaked in 2015 at 5.3% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 4.7% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 15% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 2.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the AL average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073005302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073005302?

Census tract 01073005302 in the Roebuck neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073005302?

Median gross rent is $1,301/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 9% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073005302?

4.1% of residents in tract 01073005302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,599.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073005302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 19th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 37th, minority 69th, housing 13th.
Q5

Is tract 01073005302 considered part of Roebuck?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073005302 fall within Roebuck (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073005302?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 85 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073005302 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.70% of renter households, peaking at 5.3% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01073005302 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01073005302 compare to Birmingham overall?

Tract 01073005302 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Birmingham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 01073005302 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham

Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related