Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Anderson Place Historic District Eviction Risk: Lower , Birmingham
Tract 01073010702 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 6,098 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 01073010702 in the Anderson Place Historic District area of Homewood, AL reads lower for landlord eviction risk. The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty at 1.6/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 18%
Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units2,315
Renter share28.9%
SVI overall0.08
Poverty rate9.0%
Median income$108,852
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
17
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
19
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
33
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Birmingham and the region
Centroid at 33.4768, -86.7958 · click any tract to drill in
Why Anderson Place Historic District scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Birmingham
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
9.0% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,622 rent vs county FMR
7.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Birmingham
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Birmingham
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Birmingham
5.6
How Anderson Place Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 8
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 7%Socioeconomic
- 11%Household composition
- 29%Racial/ethnic minority
- 28%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 43%Grade B
- 19%Grade C
- 33%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 186Total filings over 11 yrs
- 2.56%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.3%Peak (2001)
- 6Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 76% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Anderson Place Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.4%Housing insecurity
- 5.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.7%Food insecurity
- 5.1%SNAP enrollment
- 5.2%Transit barriers
- 5.7%No health insurance
- 14.3%Frequent mental distress
- 24.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Anderson Place Historic District
The voucher gap is 28.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Cost burden runs 36% here against 46.3% across Jefferson County.
Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10. It sits 1.3 points below the Jefferson County average of 4.3. Running hot, supply constraint reads 7.8/10.
Severe burden reaches 12%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. SNAP participation runs 5.1% against 15.2% nationally.
Food insecurity runs 8.7% against 17.8% nationally. Court records carry 186 eviction filings across 11 observed years.
Average gross rent is $1,622, 11% above the Homewood average. The worst year on record was 2001, when 4.3% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Birmingham. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 01073010702
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073010702?
Census tract 01073010702 in the Anderson Place Historic District neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01073010702?
Median gross rent is $1,622/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073010702?
9.0% of residents in tract 01073010702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,098.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073010702?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 8th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 11th, minority 29th, housing 28th.
Q5
Is tract 01073010702 considered part of Anderson Place Historic District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073010702 fall within Anderson Place Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073010702?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 186 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073010702 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.56% of renter households, peaking at 4.3% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 01073010702 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 01073010702 compare to Birmingham overall?
Tract 01073010702 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Birmingham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 01073010702 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 33% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham
Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related