Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally

Anderson Place Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Birmingham

Tract 01073004902 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 3,183 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi

01073004902 is a census tract in the Anderson Place Historic District area of Birmingham, AL. It scores 5.3/10 for landlords. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 49% Owners 19%
Tract context
Occupied units1,937
Renter share80.6%
SVI overall0.48
Poverty rate21.8%
Median income$48,064

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Anderson Place Historic District
Very High
Within parent city
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#44 of 71 tracts In Birmingham
Low
Within county
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#68 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Elevated
Within state
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#155 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Birmingham and the region

Centroid at 33.4936, -86.8011 · click any tract to drill in

Why Anderson Place Historic District scores 5.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Birmingham
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
21.8% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$960 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Birmingham
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Birmingham
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Birmingham
3.0

How Anderson Place Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Anderson Place Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.3This tracttract 0049024.0Birminghamparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 48

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,076Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 7.28%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.1%Peak (2002)
  • 58Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 01073004902
Filings dropped 58% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Anderson Place Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Anderson Place Historic District

81% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

17% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Cost burden runs 39% here against 46.3% across Jefferson County. The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.5/10. Against the Jefferson County average of 4.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,076 filings here across 11 tracked years.

At $960 a month, rents run 13% under what the rest of Birmingham commands. Filings peaked in 2002 at 13.1% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073004902

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073004902?

Census tract 01073004902 in the Anderson Place Historic District neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073004902?

Median gross rent is $960/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073004902?

21.8% of residents in tract 01073004902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,183.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073004902?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 0th, minority 50th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 01073004902 considered part of Anderson Place Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073004902 fall within Anderson Place Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073004902?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,076 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073004902 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.28% of renter households, peaking at 13.1% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01073004902 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01073004902 compare to Birmingham overall?

Tract 01073004902 scores 5.3/10, higher than the parent city of Birmingham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 01073004902 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham

Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related