Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,554 of 84,120 nationally
Alabama Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chickasaw
Tract 01097005200 · Mobile County, AL · pop 1,431 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Eviction risk in the Alabama Village area of Chickasaw centers on tract 01097005200, which scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 1,431 residents. That is riskier than roughly 82% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 59% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,030 a month against an average household income of $38,875 a year, roughly 32% of income at the averages. About 54% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 46%
Tract context
Occupied units609
Renter share54.2%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate24.4%
Median income$38,875
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
75
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
73
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chickasaw and the region
Centroid at 30.7636, -88.0781 · click any tract to drill in
Why Alabama Village scores 5.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chickasaw
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
24.4% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$1,030 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chickasaw
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.6
How Alabama Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 53
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 67%Socioeconomic
- 15%Household composition
- 60%Racial/ethnic minority
- 52%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 155Total filings over 10 yrs
- 6.94%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.8%Peak (2002)
- 9Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Alabama Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 19.8%Housing insecurity
- 14.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 28.0%Food insecurity
- 23.7%SNAP enrollment
- 14.1%Transit barriers
- 11.4%No health insurance
- 19.7%Frequent mental distress
- 40.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Alabama Village
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chickasaw, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Mobile County average of 4.9 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 53rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 19.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 14.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 01097005200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097005200?
Census tract 01097005200 in the Alabama Village neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01097005200?
Median gross rent is $1,030/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01097005200?
24.4% of residents in tract 01097005200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,431.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01097005200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 67th, household 15th, minority 60th, housing 52th.
Q5
Is tract 01097005200 considered part of Alabama Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01097005200 fall within Alabama Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097005200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 155 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01097005200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.94% of renter households, peaking at 9.8% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 01097005200 struggle to pay rent?
About 19.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 01097005200 compare to Chickasaw overall?
Tract 01097005200 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chickasaw at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chickasaw; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chickasaw
Top eight tracts in Chickasaw ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related